Dricus Du Plessis vs Khamzat Chimaev
Sean Strickland vs Allen/Hernandez winner
Weili Zhang vs Virna Jandiroba (with win)
Tatiana Suarez vs Mackenzie Dern
Tallison Teixeira vs Hamdy Abdelwahab
Justin Tafa vs Lukasz Brzeski
Rodolfo Bellato vs Marcin Prachnio
Jimmy Crute vs Vitor Petrino
Jake Matthews vs Neil Magny (callout)
Francisco Prado vs Ange Loosa
Gabriel Santos vs Julian Erosa
Jack Jenkins vs Morgan Charriere (with loss)
Tom Nolan vs Holobaugh/Hernandez winner
Viacheslav Borshchev vs MarQuel Mederos
Cong Wang vs Lee/Aldrich winner
Bruna Brasil vs Maryna Moroz
Aleksander Topuria vs Cody Haddon (rebook)
Colby Thicknesse vs Baergeng Jieleyisi
Rongzhu vs Guram Kutateladze
Kody Steele vs Mohammad Yahya
Jonathan Micallef vs Charles Radtke
Kevin Jousset vs Trevin Giles
Quillan Salkilld vs Yanal Ashmouz
Anshul Jubli vs Darrius Flowers
You are probably right but it's a weird one since nobody can give Weili a competitive fight in her division. Maybe make Valentina vs Manon in the spring (April?) and the winner fights Weili in November/December. During that time maybe someone emerges that can fight Weili in her own division.Fiorot has been in line to fight valentina for like a year now. That's gotta happen first.
I watch every event, every Saturday they are on. I have no clue who a good 75% of the roster is. Such a forgettable era of UFC we are in.I don't recognize half of these names and I haven't missed a UFC card in 8 years, including DWCS and TUF.
Reasonable, but I would rather see them facing someone on a win-streak. I generally dislike when top fighters on losing streaks face each other instead of new blood.Sean vs Izzy
So now we have a two man backlog at MW? We got Khazamat and then Imnanov in that order? Yes, DDP is active but if we already have two MW's lined up that's over a year minimum, prob more like 2, before we have a non predictable title fight. No thanks. Not to mention if we have a split decision that demands a rematch like, oh idk....like what happened last night with Strickland.He can be after Khamzat. Khamzat earned his shot before Imavov did. A travesty that we wasted another title shot on the Sean rematch, we shouldn't waste another one before we get to see DDP vs Khamzat.
I would say book DDP vs Khamzat, and then Imavov vs Caio to decide the next title-challengerAs far as rankings shouldn't it be DDP vs Imanov? Wonderful striking battle
So now we have a two man backlog at MW? We got Khazamat and then Imnanov in that order? Yes, DDP is active but if we already have two MW's lined up that's over a year minimum, prob more like 2, before we have a non predictable title fight. No thanks. Not to mention if we have a split decision that demands a rematch like, oh idk....like what happened last night with Strickland.
Furthermore and a few things to consider:
- DDP has solid wrestling but is primarily a striker. Would you rather see an exciting title fight where two guys will engage in striking? Or a wrestlefuck party? The UFC has made it abundantly clear what they want. Look at the recent cuts. They want KO's.
- Danar loves Caio and fighting nerds. He's not gonna wait nearly two more years for a TS.
- Can Khazamat consistently have a clear visa? Imanov can.
- And the obvious and previously stated, Imanov is #2 and Khazmat is #3.
Need the pros opinion @BoxerMaurits
I'd way rather Jake Matthews vs Vicente LuqueJake Matthews vs Neil Magny (callout)
Khamzat is undefeated and he's also the consensus tougher fight. Imavov did lose to Strickland about 2 years ago. Khamzat earned the titleshot before Imavov. Dana has said he will get the next shot, which he also said that he would get after he beat Usman. He also said he would get a WW titleshot after beating Burns. Dricus is more excited about facing Khamzat since he's the guy with the most hype around.As far as rankings shouldn't it be DDP vs Imanov? Wonderful striking battle
So now we have a two man backlog at MW? We got Khazamat and then Imnanov in that order? Yes, DDP is active but if we already have two MW's lined up that's over a year minimum, prob more like 2, before we have a non predictable title fight. No thanks. Not to mention if we have a split decision that demands a rematch like, oh idk....like what happened last night with Strickland.
Furthermore and a few things to consider:
- DDP has solid wrestling but is primarily a striker. Would you rather see an exciting title fight where two guys will engage in striking? Or a wrestlefuck party? The UFC has made it abundantly clear what they want. Look at the recent cuts. They want KO's.
- Danar loves Caio and fighting nerds. He's not gonna wait nearly two more years for a TS.
- Can Khazamat consistently have a clear visa? Imanov can.
- And the obvious and previously stated, Imanov is #2 and Khazmat is #3.
Need the pros opinion @BoxerMaurits
Well said, sir.Khamzat is undefeated and he's also the consensus tougher fight. Imavov did lose to Strickland about 2 years ago. Khamzat earned the titleshot before Imavov. Dana has said he will get the next shot, which he also said that he would get after he beat Usman. He also said he would get a WW titleshot after beating Burns. Dricus is more excited about facing Khamzat since he's the guy with the most hype around.
The one in recent years who never earned his titleshot was Strickland, before becoming a champ he never had wins over a top 5 opponent. He then got his rematch because he beat Costa on a losing streak and because his titlefight was close, but he had 0 defenses.
You can't say Khamzat is less exciting to watch than Imavov, if that's really your opinion you're definitely in the minority.
If they wanted KO's, they would have cut Strickland. They want fighters who people want to watch fight, either because of their fighting style or personalities or skills or Instagram followers. Also, the oil money guys would riot if Dana delayed Khamzats titleshot any longer. Remember, he's a very big draw for the Abu Dhabi and Saudi cards.
He also became a citizen of UAE, so it's very likely that his visa issues will be easier to handle now.
When there is a backlog of worthy contenders I doubt they would do a rematch if the champ lost. If Khamzat would be injured or something before his shot, Imavov can get the shot instead, no problem.
Why would Caio have to wait 2 years? Let's say they do Dricus vs Khamzat in June, Khamzat/DDP vs Imavov in October, Khamzat/DDP vs Caio (if he wins one more) in January or February. 1 year, not 2.
The pro has spoken and I shall deflectI would say book DDP vs Khamzat, and then Imavov vs Caio to decide the next title-challenger
Amen, brosefThe pro has spoken and I shall deflect