M. Night Shyamalan's GLASS (Dragonlord's Review)

If you have seen GLASS, how would you rate it?


  • Total voters
    85
GLASS more than anything illustrates the importance of timing in terms of the cinematic landscape. UNBREAKABLE had always been intended as a trilogy but due to poor reception Shyamalan became too gunshy, then slowly withered on the vine. It would have been the trilogy and not just UNBREAKABLE that put itself in prime position to be the precursor -- the de facto "origin story" -- of ALL modern comic book films.

Back in 2000 comic book films were still regarded as being on the fringe, laughable, and weird. UNBREAKABLE sought to transport "kid's" fiction into myth, and make it real and serious -- and the 2000 version of us kinda weren't ready for that. Who knew that in the intervening time the geek would inherit the (film) earth and comic book films would become the standard cinematic language twenty years later?

Consequently the trilogy is behind-the-times on a path it itself co-created. HOWEVER, if it didn't hem and haw it probably wouldn't have benefited from James MacAvoy's stunning turn as Kevin Wendell Crumb. Despite some weaknesses of plot, I think the narrative is much stronger than people give it credit for; and, for $20m, I think it's damn impressive still.

I loved UNBREAKABLE, SPLIT was great, and GLASS completes a dangling plotline that's been needling me for almost 20 years.
 
Here's my take.

Spoiler alert, lots of spoilers in here. Don't read ahead if you haven't seen it yet & you don't want details.

The first film is called ‘Unbreakable’; I think this film should have been called 'Unbearable'. Or perhaps ‘Unforgivable’? It’s so weirdly, awkwardly bad. 20 years of anticipation, & M. Night delivers this shit? I haven’t seen a trilogy drop off this much or end this poorly since Chuck / Tito III.

First off, let’s start with the title. The fucking movie is called GLASS, right? And yet, Samuel L. Jackson literally doesn’t say a goddamn word, for the first HOUR of the fucking movie. He spends the entire first half of the film (when he’s even shown) just sitting there, catatonic. What an absolute waste of a great actor, & character. The first film was about the hero Dunn; the second film was about the villain, Crumb. Clearly, this film was supposed to be about the architect behind them both, Mr. Glass; but it really wasn’t. It really kind of isn’t about any of them. In fact, this shitty actress from American Horror Story & Birdbox (who seems to be popping up in every shitty fucking thing lately) is in *more of the movie*, than Mr. Glass is. And she sucks, and her character sucks. Robin Wright, an actual good actress, who was actually relevant to this story, is conspicuously absent from the film.

Which leads to the next major problem with this suckfest: even David Fucking Dunn himself, is barely used to any meaningful extent in this movie. We don’t really flesh his character out any more, at all. Wondering what he’s been up to for the last 20 years? Apparently, next to nothing. Some lazy ‘Dunn Security’ facade is thrown together at the very beginning for just a few minutes, and we’re supposed to believe that he’s just been kinda hanging around, literally walking around the block, stopping the occasional mugger or two. And he still just wears the same poncho to do it, with his face exposed, in the age of cameras everywhere. It’s just goofy as fuck. His son is back, and it’s the same actor - I actually appreciated that, and liked him. He even does a decent job; it’s just that like everyone else, he has been given garbage to work with here.

Most of the film (the vast majority) takes place in the most unrealistic criminal psychiatric institute ever. They have a notorious serial murderer (The Horde) locked up here; and yet, the total staff of the place seems to be: ONE mall cop at the front entrance, and then ONE orderly on duty, and… that’s it? A few random employees, hanging around far away in a basement tunnel? We’re talking about a place where a high-risk inmate’s cell door can be blown off, & people can be killed, and no one notices… for HOURS, upon hours? It’s fucking stupid, terrible writing.

The whole ‘twist’ ending is insultingly bad, as well. A secret group of people, with the same *highly visible* 'I'm in a secret society' tattoo on their wrists, have been, for centuries, looking for superheroes & villains… in order to try & convince them, that they’re not really superheroes & villains, because… yeah this sentence is literally too stupid to finish. Unless your name is M. Night, apparently. And then, it's a good enough idea to hinge your entire legacy of a story on. Maybe the M. stands for ‘I M. a fucking retard’? At best, this was like the worst Twilight Zone episode ever. But not even the original series, that would be too high-quality; more like if there was a Twilight Zone reboot on the SyFy channel. Bad ideas, with mediocre execution.

The only problem is, this wasn't just some random movie: this was supposed to be the follow-up to a truly remarkable film 19 years ago - Unbreakable - and a direct follow-up to a very good film, in SPLIT. This film does not hold a goddamn candle to either one. Not even close. All the directions Shyamalan could have taken the story after all these years, all the ways he could have wrapped it up, and instead he just kind of fucks around half-assed with his characters, and then does next to nothing with them. There are no truly great scenes in this movie; zero. Nothing that takes your breath away, no big moments that will stick with you afterwards, the way there were a bunch in the previous films. Even the little things, that felt huge in Unbreakable - like Dunn’s power of seeing a person’s sins when he touches them - fall completely flat here. We see that power used twice in GLASS, and both times, it is completely underwhelming.

And the saddest part is, all the ingredients were here. Willis, Jackson, McAvoy - all the pieces are right there on the chessboard, ready to be used; but M. Night just had no great ideas on how to use them anymore. There is no great script here, no amazing concepts. He doesn’t delve deeper into ANY of the characters: their best moments are all behind them, in the previous films. The only ‘resolution’ they get is to suddenly die at the end, but there is no great meaning to it. In fact he actually sacrifices the entire combined story of the first two installments, for a dumb twist that had absolutely zero buildup in the previous films.

So the trilogy ends with Shyamalan suddenly killing off the 3 main characters, for the sake of a quick awful twist, that isn’t very fleshed-out, was not all that interesting to begin with, and also is not remotely believable. It’s a cheap, cheesy move, and it doesn’t work on any level. Ironically, GLASS is a bigger disaster than anything Mr. Glass himself could have masterminded.

It doesn’t even match the tone of the previous two films, either. Those films are both dark, gritty, taking place in ‘the real world’; this one is bright, cheesy, & feels fake from beginning to end. Again, it feels more like a SyFy original film or something. This film fails so badly, especially when compared to the original films it attempts to conclude, that I will pretty much just ignore it entirely when I think about Unbreakable, or SPLIT. It’s basically in the same ‘Let’s just pretend this shit didn’t happen’ category as Indiana Jones 4. As far as I’m concerned, it’s not canon; it’s a piece of shit, that should be fired out of a cannon. Preferably, into M. Night’s stupid face.

Other than that, I have no strong feelings on the matter.
 
Finally saw this. When you take into account that it's basically a B-movie, it's pretty damned good. If you're expecting A-list effects and shit like that, you'll be disappointed.

You just have to surrender your expectations and go for the ride. It is what it is. M Knight has his way of doing things, and he doesn't have 250 million to work with. You just have to know all of that going in. 20 million bucks and half of it probably went to the actors. Split was 5 million. Crazy that they're running these in main theaters. The man financed this movie ON HIS OWN. Props to M Knight.
 
It's weird, seems like most posts itt are shitting on the movie yet there's not a single vote for anything below "average" in the poll

Might say something about the expectation levels going into the film -- even though people apparently left angry and pissed off they still can't bring themselves to say it was a below average movie
 
Here's my take.

Spoiler alert, lots of spoilers in here. Don't read ahead if you haven't seen it yet & you don't want details.

The first film is called ‘Unbreakable’; I think this film should have been called 'Unbearable'. Or perhaps ‘Unforgivable’? It’s so weirdly, awkwardly bad. 20 years of anticipation, & M. Night delivers this shit? I haven’t seen a trilogy end this poorly since Chuck / Tito III.

First off, let’s start with the title. The fucking movie is called GLASS, right? And yet, Samuel L. Jackson literally doesn’t say a goddamn word, for the first HOUR of the fucking movie. He spends the entire first half of the film (when he’s even shown) just sitting there, catatonic. What an absolute waste of a great actor, & character. The first film was about the hero Dunn; the second film was about the villain, Crumb. Clearly, this film was supposed to be about the architect behind them both, Mr. Glass; but it really wasn’t. It really kind of isn’t about any of them. In fact, this shitty actress from American Horror Story & Birdbox (who seems to be popping up in every shitty fucking thing lately) is in *more of the movie*, than Mr. Glass is. And she sucks, and her character sucks. Robin Wright, an actual good actress, who was actually relevant to this story, is conspicuously absent from the film.

Which leads to the next major problem with this suckfest: even David Fucking Dunn himself, is barely used to any meaningful extent in this movie. We don’t really flesh his character out any more, at all. Wondering what he’s been up to for the last 20 years? Apparently, next to nothing. Some lazy ‘Dunn Security’ facade is thrown together at the very beginning for just a few minutes, and we’re supposed to believe that he’s just been kinda hanging around, literally walking around the block, stopping the occasional mugger or two. And he still just wears the same poncho to do it, with his face exposed, in the age of cameras everywhere. It’s just goofy as fuck. His son is back, and it’s the same actor - I actually appreciated that, and liked him. He even does a decent job; it’s just that like everyone else, he has been given garbage to work with here.

Most of the film (the vast majority) takes place in the most unrealistic criminal psychiatric institute ever. They have a notorious serial murderer (The Horde) locked up here; and yet, the total staff of the place seems to be: ONE mall cop at the front entrance, and then ONE orderly on duty, and… that’s it? A few random employees, hanging around far away in a basement tunnel? We’re talking about a place where a high-risk inmate’s cell door can be blown off, & people can be killed, and no one notices… for HOURS, upon hours? It’s fucking stupid, terrible writing.

The whole ‘twist’ ending is insultingly bad, as well. A secret group of people, with the same *highly visible* 'I'm in a secret society' tattoo on their wrists, have been, for centuries, looking for superheroes & villains… in order to try & convince them, that they’re not really superheroes & villains, because… yeah this sentence is literally too stupid to finish. Unless your name is M. Night, apparently. And then, it's a good enough idea to hinge your entire legacy of a story on. Maybe the M. stands for ‘I M. a fucking retard’? At best, this was like the worst Twilight Zone episode ever. But not even the original series, that would be too high-quality; more like if there was a Twilight Zone reboot on the SyFy channel. Bad ideas, with mediocre execution.

The only problem is, this wasn't just some random movie: this was supposed to be the follow-up to a truly remarkable film 19 years ago - Unbreakable - and a direct follow-up to a very good film, in SPLIT. This film does not hold a goddamn candle to either one. Not even close. All the directions Shyamalan could have taken the story after all these years, all the ways he could have wrapped it up, and instead he just kind of fucks around half-assed with his characters, and then does next to nothing with them. There are no truly great scenes in this movie; zero. Nothing that takes your breath away, no big moments that will stick with you afterwards, the way there were a bunch in the previous films. Even the little things, that felt huge in Unbreakable - like Dunn’s power of seeing a person’s sins when he touches them - fall completely flat here. We see that power used twice in GLASS, and both times, it is completely underwhelming.

And the saddest part is, all the ingredients were here. Willis, Jackson, McAvoy - all the pieces are right there on the chessboard, ready to be used; but M. Night just had no great ideas on how to use them anymore. There is no great script here, no amazing concepts. He doesn’t delve deeper into ANY of the characters: their best moments are all behind them, in the previous films. The only ‘resolution’ they get is to suddenly die at the end, but there is no great meaning to it. In fact he actually sacrifices the entire combined story of the first two installments, for a dumb twist that had absolutely zero buildup in the previous films.

So the trilogy ends with Shyamalan suddenly killing off the 3 main characters, for the sake of a quick awful twist, that isn’t very fleshed-out, was not all that interesting to begin with, and also is not remotely believable. It’s a cheap, cheesy move, and it doesn’t work on any level. Ironically, GLASS is a bigger disaster than anything Mr. Glass himself could have masterminded.

It doesn’t even match the tone of the previous two films, either. Those films are both dark, gritty, taking place in ‘the real world’; this one is bright, cheesy, & feels fake from beginning to end. Again, it feels more like a SyFy original film or something. This film fails so badly, especially when compared to the original films it attempts to conclude, that I will pretty much just ignore it entirely when I think about Unbreakable, or SPLIT. It’s basically in the same ‘Let’s just pretend this shit didn’t happen’ category as Indiana Jones 4. As far as I’m concerned, it’s not canon; it’s a piece of shit, that should be fired out of a cannon. Preferably, into M. Night’s stupid face.

Other than that, I have no strong feelings on the matter.
After a rewatch with a girl. (Yes a real girl, it's why I agreed to go again) I completely agree with this. Especially the not utilizing SLJ and hating that stupid Dr. Chicks face.
 
Finally saw this. When you take into account that it's basically a B-movie, it's pretty damned good. If you're expecting A-list effects and shit like that, you'll be disappointed.

You just have to surrender your expectations and go for the ride. It is what it is. M Knight has his way of doing things, and he doesn't have 250 million to work with. You just have to know all of that going in. 20 million bucks and half of it probably went to the actors. Split was 5 million. Crazy that they're running these in main theaters. The man financed this movie ON HIS OWN. Props to M Knight.
This is what I'm saying.

But also this:
giphy.gif
 
If you liked Unbreakable and Split, well then you gotta finish it.
 
I don't get it.....

Chris Stuckmann, Jeremy Johns, and Collider really didn't like this film...

The critics hated it, 36% on RT.

But an audience score of 79%.

7.1 on imdb, which means just okay or so so.

Another Venom situation? Maybe it's worth seeing?

I loved Unbreakable. I'm not a fan of Split.
 
Here's my take.

Spoiler alert, lots of spoilers in here. Don't read ahead if you haven't seen it yet & you don't want details.

The first film is called ‘Unbreakable’; I think this film should have been called 'Unbearable'. Or perhaps ‘Unforgivable’? It’s so weirdly, awkwardly bad. 20 years of anticipation, & M. Night delivers this shit? I haven’t seen a trilogy drop off this much or end this poorly since Chuck / Tito III.

First off, let’s start with the title. The fucking movie is called GLASS, right? And yet, Samuel L. Jackson literally doesn’t say a goddamn word, for the first HOUR of the fucking movie. He spends the entire first half of the film (when he’s even shown) just sitting there, catatonic. What an absolute waste of a great actor, & character. The first film was about the hero Dunn; the second film was about the villain, Crumb. Clearly, this film was supposed to be about the architect behind them both, Mr. Glass; but it really wasn’t. It really kind of isn’t about any of them. In fact, this shitty actress from American Horror Story & Birdbox (who seems to be popping up in every shitty fucking thing lately) is in *more of the movie*, than Mr. Glass is. And she sucks, and her character sucks. Robin Wright, an actual good actress, who was actually relevant to this story, is conspicuously absent from the film.

Which leads to the next major problem with this suckfest: even David Fucking Dunn himself, is barely used to any meaningful extent in this movie. We don’t really flesh his character out any more, at all. Wondering what he’s been up to for the last 20 years? Apparently, next to nothing. Some lazy ‘Dunn Security’ facade is thrown together at the very beginning for just a few minutes, and we’re supposed to believe that he’s just been kinda hanging around, literally walking around the block, stopping the occasional mugger or two. And he still just wears the same poncho to do it, with his face exposed, in the age of cameras everywhere. It’s just goofy as fuck. His son is back, and it’s the same actor - I actually appreciated that, and liked him. He even does a decent job; it’s just that like everyone else, he has been given garbage to work with here.

Most of the film (the vast majority) takes place in the most unrealistic criminal psychiatric institute ever. They have a notorious serial murderer (The Horde) locked up here; and yet, the total staff of the place seems to be: ONE mall cop at the front entrance, and then ONE orderly on duty, and… that’s it? A few random employees, hanging around far away in a basement tunnel? We’re talking about a place where a high-risk inmate’s cell door can be blown off, & people can be killed, and no one notices… for HOURS, upon hours? It’s fucking stupid, terrible writing.

The whole ‘twist’ ending is insultingly bad, as well. A secret group of people, with the same *highly visible* 'I'm in a secret society' tattoo on their wrists, have been, for centuries, looking for superheroes & villains… in order to try & convince them, that they’re not really superheroes & villains, because… yeah this sentence is literally too stupid to finish. Unless your name is M. Night, apparently. And then, it's a good enough idea to hinge your entire legacy of a story on. Maybe the M. stands for ‘I M. a fucking retard’? At best, this was like the worst Twilight Zone episode ever. But not even the original series, that would be too high-quality; more like if there was a Twilight Zone reboot on the SyFy channel. Bad ideas, with mediocre execution.

The only problem is, this wasn't just some random movie: this was supposed to be the follow-up to a truly remarkable film 19 years ago - Unbreakable - and a direct follow-up to a very good film, in SPLIT. This film does not hold a goddamn candle to either one. Not even close. All the directions Shyamalan could have taken the story after all these years, all the ways he could have wrapped it up, and instead he just kind of fucks around half-assed with his characters, and then does next to nothing with them. There are no truly great scenes in this movie; zero. Nothing that takes your breath away, no big moments that will stick with you afterwards, the way there were a bunch in the previous films. Even the little things, that felt huge in Unbreakable - like Dunn’s power of seeing a person’s sins when he touches them - fall completely flat here. We see that power used twice in GLASS, and both times, it is completely underwhelming.

And the saddest part is, all the ingredients were here. Willis, Jackson, McAvoy - all the pieces are right there on the chessboard, ready to be used; but M. Night just had no great ideas on how to use them anymore. There is no great script here, no amazing concepts. He doesn’t delve deeper into ANY of the characters: their best moments are all behind them, in the previous films. The only ‘resolution’ they get is to suddenly die at the end, but there is no great meaning to it. In fact he actually sacrifices the entire combined story of the first two installments, for a dumb twist that had absolutely zero buildup in the previous films.

So the trilogy ends with Shyamalan suddenly killing off the 3 main characters, for the sake of a quick awful twist, that isn’t very fleshed-out, was not all that interesting to begin with, and also is not remotely believable. It’s a cheap, cheesy move, and it doesn’t work on any level. Ironically, GLASS is a bigger disaster than anything Mr. Glass himself could have masterminded.

It doesn’t even match the tone of the previous two films, either. Those films are both dark, gritty, taking place in ‘the real world’; this one is bright, cheesy, & feels fake from beginning to end. Again, it feels more like a SyFy original film or something. This film fails so badly, especially when compared to the original films it attempts to conclude, that I will pretty much just ignore it entirely when I think about Unbreakable, or SPLIT. It’s basically in the same ‘Let’s just pretend this shit didn’t happen’ category as Indiana Jones 4. As far as I’m concerned, it’s not canon; it’s a piece of shit, that should be fired out of a cannon. Preferably, into M. Night’s stupid face.

Other than that, I have no strong feelings on the matter.
Brilliant post. 100% agree.

Yes, the movie is called GLASS, and the character doesn't talk for the first damn hour of the movie. He's used as a plot device to get the story going, but there isn't any real look at his character and what he's about.
Same thing with Dunn, no exploration of his character and what he's been doing the past 20 years....who he is..why he does what he does. Nothing.
The doctor and her stupid face. Why????????????????

The most frustrating thing about this movie was that ALL of the pieces to make this movie great were RIGHT THERE. All M. Night had to do was put a puzzle together, a puzzle that a 8 year old could have done.
NOBODY gives a shit about this secret society that makes no sense. SO why waste time talking about them when you have THREE characters to worry about?

And then to end the movie on Glass's Mom, Kevin's victim, and Dunn's son? I was like 'lol wtf...'
Why would these people be together????? Glass was an evil mofo that killed people--why would his mom be hanging and holding hands with the son of the man that put her son in a mental ward that left him catatonic???? Why would 'The Beast's victim be there mourning him???? Why are they all sitting down holding hands at a train station??? Since when does the news ever worked in that way? A news story happens, and everyone gets a buzz on their phone all at the same time and stops what they're doing to share it with strangers? lol what?
Hot garbage.
 
Movie was entertaining, but man did they drop the ball in a major way to close out the trilogy.
 
Other random dumb shit I remembered

*The movie starts off with 2 guys--1 is filming the other "superman punching" an old man for his Youtube or WorldStar channel or something. lol Really? That was like 5 years ago

*M. Night is a shitty actor, and that scene with him, Dunn, and Dunn's son talking in their security shop was just weird and awkward. "I'm gonna take a walk" "I don't think you need to take a walk right now dad" "I'm gonna take a walk..." whoooooooo talks like this???

*You have superpowered dangerous people...and you have some dorks guarding them?? You also put Dunn and The Beast in rooms RIGHT NEXT to each other???????
And if you were trying to convince Dunn that he didn't have powers, then why have the water rigged rooM?

*There was another scene with the most unnatural, weirdest conversation I've ever seen. It was "The Room" worthy. When Glass gets out of his room, the tall skinny guy comes into work late, talks to the security guard..and he starts going on and on about keto and diet...just totally out of the blue..unprompted..who does that?????? It wasn't even like he was some sort of bodybuilder.

*What was that scene with the Horde character that was supposed to be a chick..or a gay dude...and he's laying down on the floor, and he asks the worker to pick up the syringe for him??? What was that? Why did he even have a needle? Was he trying to seduce the guy? Why did the guy hit the light flashing thing like 39,000 times instead of just getting the fuck out of the room????

*How did this secret society think they were going to convince grown ass men that they don't have the powers that they know that they have? And then what would be the plan??

*That secret society member drowned Dunn out in the open. There were normal police there, NOBODY said anything? They just watched it happen? The cops take the son away, and then they let him go after Dunn is dead....so that they can get a dramatic shot of him pushing the cops and crying...

*What kind of sniper shoots for the stomach???? (in regards to the Beast)

I almost want to hate watch this movie again
 
*What was that scene with the Horde character that was supposed to be a chick..or a gay dude...and he's laying down on the floor, and he asks the worker to pick up the syringe for him??? What was that? Why did he even have a needle? Was he trying to seduce the guy? Why did the guy hit the light flashing thing like 39,000 times instead of just getting the fuck out of the room????

*What kind of sniper shoots for the stomach???? (in regards to the Beast)
The kind of sniper that realizes the film's best asset can't be shot through the face. They were fine doing it to Willis though. No lingering on his acting at all there. But both deaths are nods to their origins. Looking at oneself was big in SPLIT, and Dunn mentions drowning in puddles in UNBREAKABLE. Shyamalan likes his dramatic irony.

I think the personality is named Jae, and she's diabetic (hence the needle) and evil. This unnerved the nurse who kept trying to select a "good" personality, but really it's the fact that if you have James MacAvoy you use James MacAvoy.
 
*There was another scene with the most unnatural, weirdest conversation I've ever seen. It was "The Room" worthy. When Glass gets out of his room, the tall skinny guy comes into work late, talks to the security guard..and he starts going on and on about keto and diet...just totally out of the blue..unprompted..who does that?????? It wasn't even like he was some sort of bodybuilder.

He was talking about good protein sources to make Glass part of The Happening universe.

big_1472019168_image.jpg
 
I just saw this in the theater tonight. I gave it a rating of 8- Good.

I'm not going to go into details overall i enjoyed it.

The one thing i am curious about is

If anyone else gets the vibe that "parts" of Kevin Wendell Crumb/The Horde are borrowed from Francis Dolarhyde/Red Dragon character?

I see some similarities there..
 
I just saw this. My thoughts are in the spoilers tag.

The actors were A list in James McAvoy, Bruce Willis, and Samuel L Jackson. They were all on the top of their game too. The movie showed promise up until about halfway through. They stayed in the mental hospital too long and then never left it. That made it boring. Then the plot twist at the end was just weird and it sucked seeing literally everyone just die. The writing and directing let down an A list roster of actors.
 
The fact that he made water the Achilles of both his greatest hero, and the menacing aliens in films so close together, is mind bogglingly cringey when you think about it.
I hated that in Signs. It was like you expect me to believe that aliens that can fly between stars invade a planet and don't know that the thing that covers 90% of the planet is dangerous to them? Or that they can't wear water proof clothing?
 
I hated that in Signs. It was like you expect me to believe that aliens that can fly between stars invade a planet and don't know that the thing that covers 90% of the planet is dangerous to them? Or that they can't wear water proof clothing?
The guy has been given many breaks on cringe dialogue and questionable scripts. He was dubbed the next big thing, and checked a box Hollywood wanted to check, and has been given passes other directors may not have got. Same time, some of his twists were great, and stories original.

I have good ideas. I could come up with great ideas for a movie. But it takes more depth than a big idea to execute a good movie. Quite frankly, after hearing wtevr dialogue I wrote being forced out by great actors, I could probably end up with better dialogue than what I see in a lot of M. Night's movies. "He's a quarterback. This kid is 6'2, 220. He's going to be a god." The dialogue (from the train in unbreakable) is bad written, but nowhere near as bad as when spoken.. So maybe it's the direction.

The short, stunted dialogue added creepiness to the sixth sense, which had the fewest holes, and signs.. And it fit with the weird scenario in 'the village,' which might be the second best movie he made.. But it shows up brighter in most his other movies.

I'm wondering if James macavoy didn't make split better as a movie vecause it added a lot of ad-libbed dialogue.
 
I hated that in Signs. It was like you expect me to believe that aliens that can fly between stars invade a planet and don't know that the thing that covers 90% of the planet is dangerous to them? Or that they can't wear water proof clothing?

Water plot point does not hold up to a paperclip weight of scrutiny.. But was creepyvas hell upon first watch.
 
I changed my mind after thinking for a little. I appreciate what hte movie was trying to do but I still think it was executed and written poorly.

We all went in expecting a "limited edition" because that's what a 20 year build up should lead to. It ended up being an origin series. That was weird. I appreciate what Shyamalan was trying to do now but I think it was written poorly and directed poorly. The whole secret society thing wasn't done well. And to kill off the characters like that.. Unbreakable guy just drowning in a puddle, after a 20 year wait? That was ridiculous. It was so weird how he ended it.. It actually made me walk out hating the movie, not just not entertained but hating it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top