Louisiana cops are no longer allowed intercourse with suspects in custody

[Steven_Universe]

http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2018/03/rape_police_custody_law.html

Up until this year, officers were legalLy able to have consensual intercourse with people they arrested.

Ridiculous it took this long. Any sex with people in custody on the job is rape.

 

[D3thr0n3d K1ng]

Leave it to the government to ruin a good thing!!!

 

[BudKing8806]

It's always consensual if you don't ask.

 

[PainIsLIfe]

http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2018/03/rape_police_custody_law.html

Up until this year, officers were legalLy able to have consensual intercourse with people they arrested.

Ridiculous it took this long. Any sex with people in custody on the job is rape.

Now how are they going to recruit good cops. Most are just trying to get home to their families and bang a hooker in custody occasionally to relieve stress.

 

[ShoelessRye]

NY just passed similar laws as well - https://www.buzzfeed.com/albertsama...dy-banned-nypd?utm_term=.xsGqRXmM3#.xuQxdgQBO

 

[Jopious Extronimous]

Cops getting the best benefits as always.

 

[Happiness]

Nobody is going to want to work the night shift anymore.

 

[Amerikuracana]

Cops act like shit on the job with women. My ex had two cops ask for her number in one week. She gave her brothers number. One called. It's basically the reason they play hero with the "The man of the house yelled at me" calls out in the suburbs. They have this silent pact going with women.. If they shill for them, and make sure women have the power, they get to be the ones who can still act like men at work, and women give them a pass. It's a real thing. Needs to stop.

 

[Trotsky]

JFC Louisiana, how the FUCK did you not already have this law like everyone else?

 

[all caps]

Cops act like shit on the job with women. My ex had two cops ask for her number in one week. She gave her brothers number. One called. It's basically the reason they play hero with the "The man of the house yelled at me" calls out in the suburbs. They have this silent pact going with women.. If they shill for them, and make sure women have the power, they get to be the ones who can still act like men at work, and women give them a pass. It's a real thing. Needs to stop.

That sounds native to men, not just cops

 

[ShoelessRye]

Cops act like shit on the job with women. My ex had two cops ask for her number in one week. She gave her brothers number. One called. It's basically the reason they play hero with the "The man of the house yelled at me" calls out in the suburbs. They have this silent pact going with women.. If they shill for them, and make sure women have the power, they get to be the ones who can still act like men at work, and women give them a pass. It's a real thing. Needs to stop.

Not just the men -

SAN ANTONIO - A lawsuit filed in federal court Friday claims a San Antonio Police officer pulled a woman's tampon out and searched her vaginal cavity along the shoulder of a public street in 2016.

Natalie D. Simms' attorney filed the lawsuit against the City of San Antonio and a female officer, identified as Mara Wilson, stating that the search violated Simms' constitutional rights.

According to the filing, Simms was approached by officers while sitting on a curb, talking on the phone and waiting for her boyfriend. The lawsuit claims Simms consented to a search of her car, which was parked across the street from where she was sitting, and that authorities found no illegal items.

Then, the lawsuit alleges, authorities called a female officer, Wilson, to the scene to search Simms.

The lawsuit details parts of the conversations between Simms and Wilson, recorded from Wilson's body camera. According to the court documents, Simms and Wilson went back and forth about the kind of clothes she was wearing before Wilson began searching her vaginal cavity.

The following is a quotation of a conversation between Simms and Wilson, included in the lawsuit, leading up to the search:
Wilson: Stand up straight. Kind of lean back a little bit. (Inaudible) This
is -- these are shorts? Oh, it's a skirt-short?
Simms: Yes.
Wilson: Oh, hell. Okay. Look straight ahead, okay. Spread your legs. I'm
gonna ask you, do you have anything down here before I reach down here?
Simms: No. I don't have nothing in my --.
Wilson: Okay.

The lawsuit alleges Wilson assured she would not "reach," rather "just look," but that Simms kept flinching.

The following is a quotation of a conversation between Simms and Wilson, included in the lawsuit, during the search:
Wilson: Uh-huh. Are you wearing a tampon, too?
Simms: Yes.
Wilson: Okay. I just want to make sure that's what it is. Is that a tampon?
Simms: Come on. Yes.
Wilson: Huh? Is that a tampon?
Simms: It's full of blood, right? Why would you do that?

The lawsuit alleges Simms asked why she had to be searched on the side of a road and not at "the station," to which Wilson said "Which (police station)? We got a whole bunch of them."

Court documents report that Wilson told a detective she was "searching everything," and had removed Simms' tampon because she "just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything in there."

https://www.ksat.com/news/sapd-offi...vaginal-search-on-side-of-road-lawsuit-claims​

 

[Quequeg]

Not just the men -

SAN ANTONIO - A lawsuit filed in federal court Friday claims a San Antonio Police officer pulled a woman's tampon out and searched her vaginal cavity along the shoulder of a public street in 2016.

Natalie D. Simms' attorney filed the lawsuit against the City of San Antonio and a female officer, identified as Mara Wilson, stating that the search violated Simms' constitutional rights.

According to the filing, Simms was approached by officers while sitting on a curb, talking on the phone and waiting for her boyfriend. The lawsuit claims Simms consented to a search of her car, which was parked across the street from where she was sitting, and that authorities found no illegal items.

Then, the lawsuit alleges, authorities called a female officer, Wilson, to the scene to search Simms.

The lawsuit details parts of the conversations between Simms and Wilson, recorded from Wilson's body camera. According to the court documents, Simms and Wilson went back and forth about the kind of clothes she was wearing before Wilson began searching her vaginal cavity.

The following is a quotation of a conversation between Simms and Wilson, included in the lawsuit, leading up to the search:
Wilson: Stand up straight. Kind of lean back a little bit. (Inaudible) This
is -- these are shorts? Oh, it's a skirt-short?
Simms: Yes.
Wilson: Oh, hell. Okay. Look straight ahead, okay. Spread your legs. I'm
gonna ask you, do you have anything down here before I reach down here?
Simms: No. I don't have nothing in my --.
Wilson: Okay.

The lawsuit alleges Wilson assured she would not "reach," rather "just look," but that Simms kept flinching.

The following is a quotation of a conversation between Simms and Wilson, included in the lawsuit, during the search:
Wilson: Uh-huh. Are you wearing a tampon, too?
Simms: Yes.
Wilson: Okay. I just want to make sure that's what it is. Is that a tampon?
Simms: Come on. Yes.
Wilson: Huh? Is that a tampon?
Simms: It's full of blood, right? Why would you do that?

The lawsuit alleges Simms asked why she had to be searched on the side of a road and not at "the station," to which Wilson said "Which (police station)? We got a whole bunch of them."

Court documents report that Wilson told a detective she was "searching everything," and had removed Simms' tampon because she "just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything in there."

https://www.ksat.com/news/sapd-offi...vaginal-search-on-side-of-road-lawsuit-claims​

Those southern Republican states are big into those roadside cavity searches.

 

[BudKing8806]

Holy fuck...that's crazy! Shoot all the black people you want, but not this!

Edit: was referring to this.

Not just the men -

SAN ANTONIO - A lawsuit filed in federal court Friday claims a San Antonio Police officer pulled a woman's tampon out and searched her vaginal cavity along the shoulder of a public street in 2016.

Natalie D. Simms' attorney filed the lawsuit against the City of San Antonio and a female officer, identified as Mara Wilson, stating that the search violated Simms' constitutional rights.

According to the filing, Simms was approached by officers while sitting on a curb, talking on the phone and waiting for her boyfriend. The lawsuit claims Simms consented to a search of her car, which was parked across the street from where she was sitting, and that authorities found no illegal items.

Then, the lawsuit alleges, authorities called a female officer, Wilson, to the scene to search Simms.

The lawsuit details parts of the conversations between Simms and Wilson, recorded from Wilson's body camera. According to the court documents, Simms and Wilson went back and forth about the kind of clothes she was wearing before Wilson began searching her vaginal cavity.

The following is a quotation of a conversation between Simms and Wilson, included in the lawsuit, leading up to the search:
Wilson: Stand up straight. Kind of lean back a little bit. (Inaudible) This
is -- these are shorts? Oh, it's a skirt-short?
Simms: Yes.
Wilson: Oh, hell. Okay. Look straight ahead, okay. Spread your legs. I'm
gonna ask you, do you have anything down here before I reach down here?
Simms: No. I don't have nothing in my --.
Wilson: Okay.

The lawsuit alleges Wilson assured she would not "reach," rather "just look," but that Simms kept flinching.

The following is a quotation of a conversation between Simms and Wilson, included in the lawsuit, during the search:
Wilson: Uh-huh. Are you wearing a tampon, too?
Simms: Yes.
Wilson: Okay. I just want to make sure that's what it is. Is that a tampon?
Simms: Come on. Yes.
Wilson: Huh? Is that a tampon?
Simms: It's full of blood, right? Why would you do that?

The lawsuit alleges Simms asked why she had to be searched on the side of a road and not at "the station," to which Wilson said "Which (police station)? We got a whole bunch of them."

Court documents report that Wilson told a detective she was "searching everything," and had removed Simms' tampon because she "just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything in there."

https://www.ksat.com/news/sapd-offi...vaginal-search-on-side-of-road-lawsuit-claims​

 

[Bloody Pulp]

As if recruiting wasn’t hard enough already (pun intended)

 

[Literally Bricked]

Now they won’t have any way to fuck their sister.

 

[Stoic1]

Cops.

 

[HomerThompson]

They just wanted to get home to their families.

It's called a FULL cavity search for a reason, bud.

 

[Jorge Luis Borges]

JFC Louisiana, how the FUCK did you not already have this law like everyone else?

Sadly, not everyone else had such common sense laws. New York passed a similar ban last week. It's fucked up.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Wonder how many dudes tore up their applications.

 

[Scott Parker 27]

Not just the men -

SAN ANTONIO - A lawsuit filed in federal court Friday claims a San Antonio Police officer pulled a woman's tampon out and searched her vaginal cavity along the shoulder of a public street in 2016.

Natalie D. Simms' attorney filed the lawsuit against the City of San Antonio and a female officer, identified as Mara Wilson, stating that the search violated Simms' constitutional rights.

According to the filing, Simms was approached by officers while sitting on a curb, talking on the phone and waiting for her boyfriend. The lawsuit claims Simms consented to a search of her car, which was parked across the street from where she was sitting, and that authorities found no illegal items.

Then, the lawsuit alleges, authorities called a female officer, Wilson, to the scene to search Simms.

The lawsuit details parts of the conversations between Simms and Wilson, recorded from Wilson's body camera. According to the court documents, Simms and Wilson went back and forth about the kind of clothes she was wearing before Wilson began searching her vaginal cavity.

The following is a quotation of a conversation between Simms and Wilson, included in the lawsuit, leading up to the search:
Wilson: Stand up straight. Kind of lean back a little bit. (Inaudible) This
is -- these are shorts? Oh, it's a skirt-short?
Simms: Yes.
Wilson: Oh, hell. Okay. Look straight ahead, okay. Spread your legs. I'm
gonna ask you, do you have anything down here before I reach down here?
Simms: No. I don't have nothing in my --.
Wilson: Okay.

The lawsuit alleges Wilson assured she would not "reach," rather "just look," but that Simms kept flinching.

The following is a quotation of a conversation between Simms and Wilson, included in the lawsuit, during the search:
Wilson: Uh-huh. Are you wearing a tampon, too?
Simms: Yes.
Wilson: Okay. I just want to make sure that's what it is. Is that a tampon?
Simms: Come on. Yes.
Wilson: Huh? Is that a tampon?
Simms: It's full of blood, right? Why would you do that?

The lawsuit alleges Simms asked why she had to be searched on the side of a road and not at "the station," to which Wilson said "Which (police station)? We got a whole bunch of them."

Court documents report that Wilson told a detective she was "searching everything," and had removed Simms' tampon because she "just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything in there."

https://www.ksat.com/news/sapd-offi...vaginal-search-on-side-of-road-lawsuit-claims​