• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Little Man>Big Man Thoughts

DarkKnight81 said:
People who make a big deal out of little guys getting over and vanilla midgets and all that shit are retarded. Go watch Keith Hackney whip Emanuel Yarboroughs ass. Bret Hart learned how to shoot wrestle from a real shooter, I would have picked him in a real fight against Kevin Nash.

The myth that size is everything was debunked a long time ago.
Click to expand...

So, it makes sense to you that Mysterio beat Big Show?
 
The problem isn't with big and small men, it is about conviction. If you are a smaller wrestler then you must look like you can take out the bigger man, instead of doing the same love tap forearms, hurricane canranas and roll ups that would look good against a smaller wrestler.

An example of this is Kevin Owens pop up power bombing Mark Henry. I like both wrestlers but there is just no reality in that happening in real life. I know it is just a show but there are feats of strength, and there is the stupid.
 
ProLuchaX said:
So, it makes sense to you that Mysterio beat Big Show?
Click to expand...

Well it does seem far fetched but given this is pro wrestling I'm okay with it. Mysterio is a bit unique in that he's probably the smallest most over guy ever. I don't use him a measuring stick for the entire business. I probably wouldn't have made him heavyweight champ though.
 
Mysterio never beat Big Show without a million gimmicks and selling like the giant was murdering him.

Big Show lost to Zach Gowen too, but are we to forget Brock Lesnar and Kirt Angle helped?
 
beefcake180 said:
Nash loves bashing smaller guys because he never had an ounce of in ring ability himself.
Click to expand...

It's about making money. Did Hulk Hogan care about 5 star matches?
 
[YT]BRpSoSLOR_A[/YT]
 
[YT]ysXEnuhq_Y4[/YT]
 
deezy said:
The one that tells you what is successful and what isn't.
Click to expand...

Sooo...yeah. You aren't paying attention. Yet again I don't care how "successful" someone is. If they entertain me they entertain me.
 
beefcake180 said:
Sooo...yeah. You aren't paying attention. Yet again I don't care how "successful" someone is. If they entertain me they entertain me.
Click to expand...

Just saying the "drawing power mentality" is there to tell people what works and what doesn't.

Personal preference doesn't negate proven success.
 
deezy said:
Just saying the "drawing power mentality" is there to tell people what works and what doesn't.

Personal preference doesn't negate proven success.
Click to expand...

What am I negating? You guys are attempting to debate what I personally enjoy with me and I'm genuinely confused.
 
beefcake180 said:
What am I negating? You guys are attempting to debate what I personally enjoy with me and I'm genuinely confused.
Click to expand...

I'm not debating with you. In ring ability isn't the most important thing in pro-wrestling. That's a fact.
 
beefcake180 said:
Okay. I never said it fucking was lol. Thanks for putting words in my mouth though.
Click to expand...

You are the one who thinks that Nash was jealous of smaller wrestlers with better in-ring ability.
 
It's not a debate, someone asked "what kind of mentality is that?" and you got answers.
 
Frank23 said:
You are the one who thinks that Nash was jealous of other wrestlers with better in-ring ability.
Click to expand...

That totally translates to in-ring ability is the most important thing in wrestling lol. foh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,167
Messages
58,420,986
Members
176,033
Latest member
ManoFan

Share this page

Back
Top