"Lightweight Gilbert Burns" has more fights at 170 than 155 in the UFC

[jitzmonkey]

If he goes back down to LW, all the same people who called him a "lightweight" this week will call him a "weight bully" next week LOL.

So basically if you beat him at WW, you beat a "lightweight", if you lose to him at LW, it's only because he's a "weight bully". I don't have a solution, just pointing out how weird it is.

That’s what the mute button is for.

 

[sonhow]

Almost seemed like he respected Belal's power more than Khamzat. Didnt bring the fight to him and got outpointed.

 

[Sycho Sid]

It is just a way for people to discredit his opponents. There is always something.

I do wonder why I never hear about WW Robert Whitaker though,

 

[DaQuirkMan]

If he goes back down to LW, all the same people who called him a "lightweight" this week will call him a "weight bully" next week LOL.

So basically if you beat him at WW, you beat a "lightweight", if you lose to him at LW, it's only because he's a "weight bully". I don't have a solution, just pointing out how weird it is.

haters b hating

 

[heSHurt]

Yes and?

 

[The XL]

Calling Gilbert a LW is like calling Rumble a WW, it's stupid. Gilbert clearly is a big guy who holds mass easily despite not being super tall, and was not fighting optimally at LW, just like Rumble was compromised at WW.

 

[EYEKICKFACES]

I'd love to answer you why i think this but you've already proven you're not equipped to handle any view that isn't yours to which i say good luck with that bro and i hope you have a better day than you're currently having.

Yeah you're definitely related to the guy in your AV.