Libya "Before And After" Photos Go Viral

abiG

The Last Iconoclast
Banned
Joined
Sep 19, 2017
Messages
6,172
Reaction score
0
This is what we've done Please compare with what you believe from the MSM. How many even knew that Libya went from being a stable, modernizing secular state to a hellhole of roving jihadist militias, warring rival governments, and open-air slave auctions of captured migrants?

libya1.jpg


libya%203.jpg


The ignorance of liberal interventionists is captured in the fact that they seem to have wilfully forgotten the disastrous interventions of the past 15 years, all of which, from Yugoslavia to Afghanistan to Iraq, exacerbated local tensions and led to more, not less, bloodshed. It takes a special kind of arrogance to be able to demand yet another international military venture when the terrible consequences of your last one are still plain to see. And their narcissism is contained in the fact that the real reason they are making these demands for war is to make themselves feel good, to demonstrate that they care with a capital C. They know nothing of the countries that they want to see invaded, and care little about the potential of such invasions to destabilise things further. No, all that matters is that in saying “Forget Iraq, let’s now attack Gaddafi!”, they can publicly demonstrate their own moral indefatigability.

It appears people do still care about Libya even if the political elites in Paris, London, and Washington who destroyed the country have moved on.https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-12/libya-and-after-photos-go-viral

Note: These are obviously not liberals. This is not a left/right issue.
 
I hate the term "goes viral"
That is all
 
Gaddafi did nothing wrong
 
This is what we've done Please compare with what you believe from the MSM. How many even knew that Libya went from being a stable, modernizing secular state to a hellhole of roving jihadist militias, warring rival governments, and open-air slave auctions of captured migrants?

libya1.jpg


libya%203.jpg


The ignorance of liberal interventionists is captured in the fact that they seem to have wilfully forgotten the disastrous interventions of the past 15 years, all of which, from Yugoslavia to Afghanistan to Iraq, exacerbated local tensions and led to more, not less, bloodshed. It takes a special kind of arrogance to be able to demand yet another international military venture when the terrible consequences of your last one are still plain to see. And their narcissism is contained in the fact that the real reason they are making these demands for war is to make themselves feel good, to demonstrate that they care with a capital C. They know nothing of the countries that they want to see invaded, and care little about the potential of such invasions to destabilise things further. No, all that matters is that in saying “Forget Iraq, let’s now attack Gaddafi!”, they can publicly demonstrate their own moral indefatigability.

It appears people do still care about Libya even if the political elites in Paris, London, and Washington who destroyed the country have moved on.

Note: These are obviously not liberals. This is not a left/right issue.


I want to kick that man in the balls
 
I'm confused. Is the author trying to blame liberals for trying more international interventions or what? Not seeing what relevance his previous article has to the topic at hand.
 
I'm confused. Is the author trying to blame liberals for trying more international interventions or what? Not seeing what relevance his previous article has to the topic at hand.
Looks like it, probably in reference to the calls to intervene in Syria.
 
The ancient sites were probably all wrecked too.
 
Gaddafi did nothing wrong
The Libya shit really feels like those in power in the US decided to jump in feet first without looking both ways first.

Results in a US Ambo killed along with 2 members of the security team and another civilian and a failed state like Iraq.

Better the devil you know.....
 
I'm confused. Is the author trying to blame liberals for trying more international interventions or what? Not seeing what relevance his previous article has to the topic at hand.
 
This is what we've done Please compare with what you believe from the MSM. How many even knew that Libya went from being a stable, modernizing secular state to a hellhole of roving jihadist militias, warring rival governments, and open-air slave auctions of captured migrants?

libya1.jpg


libya%203.jpg


The ignorance of liberal interventionists is captured in the fact that they seem to have wilfully forgotten the disastrous interventions of the past 15 years, all of which, from Yugoslavia to Afghanistan to Iraq, exacerbated local tensions and led to more, not less, bloodshed. It takes a special kind of arrogance to be able to demand yet another international military venture when the terrible consequences of your last one are still plain to see. And their narcissism is contained in the fact that the real reason they are making these demands for war is to make themselves feel good, to demonstrate that they care with a capital C. They know nothing of the countries that they want to see invaded, and care little about the potential of such invasions to destabilise things further. No, all that matters is that in saying “Forget Iraq, let’s now attack Gaddafi!”, they can publicly demonstrate their own moral indefatigability.

It appears people do still care about Libya even if the political elites in Paris, London, and Washington who destroyed the country have moved on.

Note: These are obviously not liberals. This is not a left/right issue.

On the bright side, that tree on the right in the last two pictures seems to have done pretty well for itself.
 
Back
Top