- Joined
- Aug 19, 2014
- Messages
- 3,286
- Reaction score
- 0
Not very good, but very tough and durable
Well, Paul Felder is very good. Norman Parke is OK. Holohan is hard to judge unless he faces adversity. Pendred is the worst one of them. McGregor is in reality a top-10 fighter, and would get eaten alive by everyone in the top 5.
I agree that they, like Brazilians on Brazilian cards, get favourable match-ups, but this is inevitable.
I forgot to add Tyson Fury.
A joke in a lot of peoples eyes but a highly skilled/technical heavyweight and he's enormous. He has the potential to be a HW champion. I know I'll get s*** on for this but he's a serious boxer.
He's from Ireland all the same. Refers to himself as Irish and does the same media/fights on the same cards with the rest of the Irish fighters and has the Irish support.
Yes, French people are caucasian. Who told you different?
Oh my god!
McGregor is being gimme fights...
... Scheduled to face arguably the number 1 P4P fighter in the world next.
What a can crusher.
Pet peeve. The Dagestanis, as an example, are caucasian. Those of Celtic/Gallic/Norman ancestry are not from the Caucasus.
Well actually, a lot of historians think they are, which is why they call them Caucasians.
Also, all of the Gauls were Celts, but Normans were not, so using Celtic/Gallic/Norman as a category is an odd choice.
I'm not debating the caucasian lineage. My problem is that the term caucasian is most often used to describe ethnicity or, even more commonly, appearance. Both of which are wrong.