Leaving Neverland...

Did Michael Jackson sexually abuse children?

  • Yes, he did.

  • No, he did not.

  • I don't know.


Results are only viewable after voting.
People want to believe MJ was a :eek::eek::eek::eek:. Its not enough to just accept him as weird.

I think it is clear he was not. As Feldman says, a :eek::eek::eek::eek: with so much opportunity cannot restrain himself. He would have dozens of victims coming forward. The temptation to take him down and then sue his estate is high.
Very plausible explanation indeed. On par with this guy:
horny-level.png
 

If MJ actually had child porn they would have thrown him in jail.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...nd-thenor-now-the_us_577fdfbce4b0f06648f4a3f8

Most of the shit that they found was inadmissible in court because it was all legal heterosexual porn (lots of it too). He also had artsy books of children/teenagers but that’s in a vast library of various subjects and none were considered child pornography. The police precinct were desperately trying to get him and faked some shit too. Woulda made their career and they found nothing...
 
Last edited:
Serious post:

I thought Corey Feelsbadman was famous for being molested by MJ. Is he backpedaling now or was this never the case?
He implied him and teh other Cory were molested. Was going to release some information right around when the metoo movement was taking off. Setup a gofundme page to "prepare" for the repercussions of exposing the Hollywood elite. Dont think it went anywhere.
 
He implied him and teh other Cory were molested. Was going to release some information right around when the metoo movement was taking off. Setup a gofundme page to "prepare" for the repercussions of exposing the Hollywood elite. Dont think it went anywhere.

???

At no time did he ever imply it was MJ... you must have imagined or wished for that part...

Edit... Oops misread your post... sorry.

I thought he revealed two people and one of them was already dead...??
 
???

At no time did he ever imply it was MJ... you must have imagined or wished for that part...

Edit... Oops misread your post... sorry.

I thought he revealed two people and one of them was already dead...??
yeah i meant to say he was recently known to potentially expose the hollywood elite of :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia and but was not implicating MJ as one of those individuals.
 
this will be on tv in australia later this week.

it will be a good watch imo.
 
haha. You are so struggling to make a point that you now are going off on wild tangents.

No, if you are drunk beyond knowing or consent, or drugged beyond knowing or consent, or lying unconscious in a hospital bed sedated and someone does something to you, that does not make you gay or a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile.

If you have intent and the ability to make an informed decision and you CHOOSE a child or a same sex partner or opposite sex partner that is what makes you a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile or gay or hetero. it is you exercising and acting upon your choice.
I cant believe you have to explain this to this guy but I'm glad someone is doing it
 
MJ diddled kids. Feldman may not have been his type .
Maybe too high profile to diddle. There’s also the distinct possibly that Feldman or some of the other boys MJ molested do not view it in a negative light. That is to say they enjoyed it and wouldn’t snitch MJ out because they don’t feel they are victims, even if they had no business having sex at that age
 
If MJ actually had child porn they would have thrown him in jail.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...nd-thenor-now-the_us_577fdfbce4b0f06648f4a3f8

Most of the shit that they found was inadmissible in court because it was all legal heterosexual porn (lots of it too). He also had artsy books of children/teenagers but that’s in a vast library of various subjects and none were considered child pornography. The police precinct were desperately trying to get him and faked some shit too. Woulda made their career and they found nothing...
It was not considered child porn because it was under the guise of nudism and technically legal. :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes have used those loopholes for years
 
Chances are we may never see incontrovertible proof either way. What you should think about isn't whether he's guilty or not. No, you guys need to examine just how little information you need in order to make such a halfasssed call. Jesus Christ, we got some real thinkers among us.
 
It was not considered child porn because it was under the guise of nudism and technically legal. :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes have used those loopholes for years

do a quick browse of the books (the non-porno ones) listed and you can buy all of them on amazon. descriptions of books appear to be of the artsy kind. All of his straight porn shit was heterosexual or female and he had several computers that had downloads of nude females. He apparently favored "Barely Legal" mags and DVDs... if that's not one of the most popular types of porn themes then I don't know my porn apparently...
 
Yeah I’m strangely looking forward to it
channel 10 on the 8th and 9th iirc. not sure what time probs 8:30.

also, growing up having this story of some form always prevalant in the 90s. will be interesting to see what is said.

but reading about it the general theme is just slamming mj lol.
 
Imagine a normal guy with a normal voice behaving like MJ with kids. I'd be 99% sure he was a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile. Now, replace the normal guy with a gender-fluid, race-fluid, billionaire Hollywood flake rockstar with a bona-fide dysfunctional childhood and a Neverland Ranch. Are you shitting me? Anybody who even needs to think twice about calling this sick fuck out is being willfully ignorant.
A "normal" man who wants kids to have sleepovers with him sounds more like a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile than a man who acts and thinks like a child who does the same thing though.
 
Ill check it out after work!

HOWEVER...Im skeptical as the next person because of the money involved, but what grown ass man wants to hang out with other peoples kids on a mystery land ranch and self admittedly sleep in the same bed at night.

Something is so far beyond wrong there if you dont see a problem then change your screen name to Gary Glitter.
 
If MJ actually had child porn they would have thrown him in jail.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...nd-thenor-now-the_us_577fdfbce4b0f06648f4a3f8

Most of the shit that they found was inadmissible in court because it was all legal heterosexual porn (lots of it too). He also had artsy books of children/teenagers but that’s in a vast library of various subjects and none were considered child pornography. The police precinct were desperately trying to get him and faked some shit too. Woulda made their career and they found nothing...
The fact that he had that much porn at his house just proves he wasn't some asexual fairy trying to relive some lost childhood, he was a red blooded male who got off on shit
 
A "normal" man who wants kids to have sleepovers with him sounds more like a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile than a man who acts and thinks like a child who does the same thing though.

Although I think you could argue the media always tend to favour the idea of the "weirdo :eek::eek::eek::eek:", the same way theres an obcession with strangers snatching kids off of the street. I suspect because this provides a bit of a distraction from the reality that most child abuse either involves family members or people in positions of trust with children such as the church.
 
I've never seen a guy get so much benefit of the doubt before. It seems impossible that he wasn't messing with kids.

Everything about his behavior and the circumstances says it clearly. The only defense to it is to concoct some totally unique human who acted like a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile all the time, but who wasn't one due to being some kind of super special man-child who innocently slept with lots of children.

It's too much.

Yes. He had all these allegations against him yet didn't appear to change his behaviour. Sounds like a deluded guy with so much money and power he didn't gaf what anybody thought he was up to.
 
do a quick browse of the books (the non-porno ones) listed and you can buy all of them on amazon. descriptions of books appear to be of the artsy kind. All of his straight porn shit was heterosexual or female and he had several computers that had downloads of nude females. He apparently favored "Barely Legal" mags and DVDs... if that's not one of the most popular types of porn themes then I don't know my porn apparently...
So you approve of barely legal? Think that’s totally fine? Ok.
 
Back
Top