I think it was a joke. And I'd wager a better one than Rubin could come up with.Dave Rubin a leading intellectual?
Holy shit you must live in a really small pond.
Dave Rubin a leading intellectual?
Holy shit you must live in a really small pond.
Dave Rubin a leading intellectual?
Holy shit you must live in a really small pond.
I listen to him but his podcast has honestly gotten old because he really doesn't have any depth beyond the initial point of fighting political correctness. I've heard him try to crack jokes at live events and they didn't land well. I can't imagine he's going to be that great. I wonder if he is going back because he has an iche for it or because the podcast isn't as successful anymore. Seems like he put a bunch of money into a studio just last year
I like Rubin and his style of interviews. But intellectual? Nein.
If that's how you want to look at it then fill your boots, or check out the channel 4 interview of Peterson. He lets his guests speak and flesh out their ideas. I like that as his conversational style allows his guest to showcase unfiltered content.You mean understanding any given topic on a totally superficial level and letting the interviewee, who almost always has a similar political orientation, blather on unchecked and unchallenged?
Thank Gay Jesus. Sorry man, I should have knownIt's amazing that political discourse has regressed to the level where anybody think that thread title was unironic.
I don't know about that but Rogan is indeed and unfunny pussyDave Rubin a leading intellectual?
Holy shit you must live in a really small pond.