• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social Lauren Boebert theater pocket pool and transexual discussion

Yeah but what's the hypocrisy here? An adult made money doing porn on a porn website. Plenty of adults do porn on porn websites... are they all responsible for "corrupting the youth"?
Um, yes. Did you really just ask if ubiquitous pornography accessible to kids is a corrupting influence on young people? Just wow.

There is pretty extensive information on the harmful effects of ubiquitous porn. There is noticeably less on the harmful effects of a 36 year old lady having her boob touched over her shirt on a date in a dark theatre.
 
You've posted the same article twice.
I somehow doubt there are "dozens" of these cases, since you had to duplicate some to make it seem abundant.

I posted the link above and below one headline.
Try again.

And of course you're not going to bother to search 'drag queen story hour :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile' to prove my assertion wrong, because my assertion is correct.

So, you have 3.

Many more than that if you search for it like I suggested?

You expect me to post the entirety of Bing results?

How many instances of a drag queen having any interactions with children? And now weight that against your 3 examples and give us the statistical number.

How about you search for it?

By your own logic, there is a stronger correlation between christianity/conservatism and :eek::eek::eek::eek:philia than drag queens, so any conservative/christian should be considered a "suspected :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile" if they interact with children?

No, not by anyone's logic apparently.

And of course, you've not linked to anything as evidence of your assertions. You just want to take your credibility as relevant in this discussion.

Given you have no credibility in this discussion, we'll take it as you talking out of your asshole.

EDIT: OH FUCKING LOL.. ITS ACTUALLY 2 EXAMPLES, SINCE BOTH THE FIRST ARTICLE (THAT YOU POSTED TWICE) AND THE LAST ARTICLE ARE ABOUT THE SAME PERSON/INCIDENT

Apparently you're completely clueless about how separate websites can have different articles about the same story.

Congratulations, you are lightly less dumb now.
But not my much.

I'll humor you and post more examples.

Judge who headed 'Drag Queen Story Hour' sponsor arrested on child porn charges
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/milwaukee-brett-blomme-arrested-drag-queen-story-hour-sponsor
So a judge who was directly supporting Drag Queen Story Hour is a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile.


A sequel to the Houston story -
Second ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ Reader Exposed As A :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/second-d...eader-exposed-as-a-:eek::eek::eek::eek:phile/

Drag Queen Story Hour Activist Arrested For Child Porn, Still Living With His Adopted Kids
https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/2...ers-when-they-can-be-used-as-political-props/

UK Drag Queen Storytime tweets out :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile slogan “Love has no age”
https://thebridgehead.ca/2020/08/14...::eek::eek::eek:phile-slogan-love-has-no-age/

BUSTED: Counselor Who Organized School Drag Show Arrested for Having Sex with 15-Year-Old Student
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...anized-drag-show-busted-for-having-s-n2607280
 
The hetero couple got a bit playful when they thought no one could see. You'd have to have some issues to make a big deal out of it
 
Why is this the angle you take instead of just agreeing that Boebert is a stupid bitch that vapes in theaters and jacks off her dates in a public settings? I don't know why you are playing this game of whataboutism in response to her inappropriate behavior when it only comes off as one of the more silly things to defend of you party members. If republicans just came out in the open and said Boebert was acting inappropriately and disowned the behavior rather than playing a "but libs" game, it wouldn't come off as so silly. The party went to bat for Gaetz and Trump so I don't know if this is a reasonable thing to ask.

Why not both?

Why can't I criticize Boebert for her hypocrisy...
...AND...
...point out the laughably transparent selective outrage of the leftists in this thread?
 
She's a politician. AOC at five was more intelligent, educated and competent than Boebert will ever be. I'm looking forward to the day she's your president, although you'll probably be dead by then.

Even the democrats know she has no hope for president.
The "bumb ass" that is probably much more intelligent than you, with a double degree in economics and international relations...

Not a sign of common sense or honesty.
 
I'll get told off if I bring up the priest percentages.
I've known a ton of drag artists over the years and know hand on heart they don't want to fuck children.

Actually no, you won't.

Regardless of political affiliation or religion -
Its either you hate :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes.
Or you are indifferent to :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes.
Or you are a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile.

Everybody is one of those three options.

As for the drag performers you know, who are 'hand on heart' not :eek::eek::eek::eek:philes, they shouldn't want to be in the proximity of children when in drag.
 
The right gets pissed because AOC is the only dem that works the media like your leading republicans do. Most of the dems are too nice and proper to rub a republican's face in shit in the media. It doesn't help get cross the aisle legislation through because it creates animosity but it rallies your base and voters so it works for getting elected and dems didn't start this style of working the media. Conservatives have been drama queens going back to the commie scare in the 50s. The world would have ended a billion times already if you went by their proclaims. Republicans hate AOC because of how effectively she rallies democrats, is a women so it looks bad to all women when they try to smear her, and she connects strongly with younger voters, a portion of the voter pool that republicans are losing badly in.

Republicans are so out of touch with younger voters that they couldn't understand that making fun of that college promo video with AOC in it dancing was pretty dumb and sexist and turned off young voters in droves. AOC doesn't really have to do much to rally younger voters other than just pointing out what stupid republicans say. If republicans got on their own members when they said stupid shit, they wouldn't have the stink of a party out of touch with young voters. Young voters don't give a shit about church, your platform to end abortion, anti-drug laws, blocking tuition aid, socially conservative values, anti-lgbt nonsense, and tax rates for the wealthy. It is like they are intentionally ignoring what will become the base.

The only place she plays well is young inexperienced young people. They believe her bullshit but as they grow and learn they will realize how full of shit she is.
 
You've decried Broebart's actions in this thread, right?

Yes and like I said I don't care for her and I've got no problem with her getting kicked out of the theater. Then when she played the "di you know who I am" card it was even worse.

The only people that play that card are ass holes.
 
Why not both?

Why can't I criticize Boebert for her hypocrisy...
...AND...
...point out the laughably transparent selective outrage of the leftists in this thread?

You are trying to make this about hypocrisy rather than the fact that she is an electedmember of congress that whose judgement is so poor that she will vape in a theater and jack off her date in public.

What you perceive as hypocrisy is just the response that should be expected when a member of the party of "family values" can't be bothered to be for family values and the party won't clean house over poor behavior. If republicans weren't always playing the "but the children" card on every occasion, you would not get quite the backlash. If you are talking about hypocrisy, it isn't Boebert that is a hypocrite, it is the entire republican party. The party itself will never hold itself to any code of conduct.
 
The only place she plays well is young inexperienced young people. They believe her bullshit but as they grow and learn they will realize how full of shit she is.

She works the media using the same exact blueprint that republicans put together.
 
There's a time and place for this sort of thing . . . while watching a musical isn't one of those places.
 
Even the democrats know she has no hope for president.


Not a sign of common sense or honesty.

Whatever, she's progressive and you're a dinosaur. You aren't equipped to see anything beyond "red good, blue bad".

Do you know anything at all about AOC's path into politics and what she accomplished?

While Boebert was marrying the sex offender who groomed her and becoming a grandmother in her thirties, AOC was paying her own way through university and helping pay her widow mother's mortgage. Whenever you people compare AOC to Boebert or MTG all it does is illustrate the dramatic disparity in candidate quality.
 
Last edited:
You are trying to make this about hypocrisy rather than the fact that she is an electedmember of congress that whose judgement is so poor that she will vape in a theater and jack off her date in public.

Wrong. That's baked into hypocrisy via her publicly supporting family values, and then jack off her date in a public theater with children present.

What you perceive as hypocrisy is just the response that should be expected when a member of the party of "family values" can't be bothered to be for family values and the party won't clean house over poor behavior. If republicans weren't always playing the "but the children" card on every occasion, you would not get quite the backlash. If you are talking about hypocrisy, it isn't Boebert that is a hypocrite, it is the entire republican party. The party itself will never hold itself to any code of conduct.

So you're shaming the Republican party for not holding itself to any code of conduct...

...while openly supporting the Democrat party which has never had any code of conduct.

Ok, gotchya.
 
Huh... Wasn't it just a few days ago that we were all very upset that the public stream of some congresswoman getting railed was made.. Well... More public? And that this was somehow an invasion of her privacy or something? And are we now raising the flag of "Well, something sexual is fine, but near children? Come on think of the children!!!" Really - after the past few years, I'm expected to believe many of you give a shit about kids being in such close proximity to sexualized activity? I mean, it ain't going to lick itself...

I'm fine with taking crazy gun lady to task for this. Thing is, if all was consistent, I don't think many of you, the media, or the democrats would be - and yet here we are analyzing black and white footage from a theatre somewhere, clutching our pearls, saying "Yep, that hand touched that boob... The HORROR!"
 
Back
Top