Lance Armstrong-- how does he do it

Meh - everyone already should no what a shit bag Pharmstrong is/was. His stages podcast is one big circle jerk to make it look like he was just trying to keep up and that USPS' drug program was the safest.


There are two myths that I would like dispel. Myths that the "avg Joe" believes and dopers like to spread.

1. Everyone at the top is doped.

2. If there was no doping the doped guys at the top would still be the best.


Even with widespread doping, there are very different tiers. It is not at all a level playing field. With natural ability, there is maybe at most 10% difference between the best person at something and the worst in the peloton. With dope that the richer cyclist and better programs have and some of these programs cost 100 of thousands of dollars a year, the gap is tremendous. Probably, on the order of 25%.

Lance Armstrong is a straight up dirt bag ,not for doping, but for efforts that he made to prevent the sport from cleaning up its act, bribing and corrupting overseeing bodies, and destroying the careers of cyclist who spoke out against doping. It would be good on the sport for Lance Armstrong to have to give back all the procedes that he gained through his illicit activities.
 
Even with widespread doping, there are very different tiers. It is not at all a level playing field. With natural ability, there is maybe at most 10% difference between the best person at something and the worst in the peloton. With dope that the richer cyclist and better programs have and some of these programs cost 100 of thousands of dollars a year, the gap is tremendous. Probably, on the order of 25%.

Lance Armstrong is a straight up dirt bag ,not for doping, but for efforts that he made to prevent the sport from cleaning up its act, bribing and corrupting overseeing bodies, and destroying the careers of cyclist who spoke out against doping. It would be good on the sport for Lance Armstrong to have to give back all the procedes that he gained through his illicit activities.
plus he only has one nut so that means he's gay.
 
I wonder how prevalent doping is in FB, BB, hockey ( Hockey never had doping scandal ), combat sports, top flight soccer, olympic sports. Baseball has the biggest scandal.

Hockey's a little different because you can't just used straight brute strength to dominate. With that said, I'm sure plenty of dudes use HGH in the offseason to heal from injuries.
 
he made this child's hobby
OoOoo.gif
 
Hockey's a little different because you can't just used straight brute strength to dominate. With that said, I'm sure plenty of dudes use HGH in the offseason to heal from injuries.

Sure you can in front of the net, digging for the puck along the boards, and smashing them with checks, and of course fighting, slap shots need lots power.

If it help in basketball or other non full contact sports like cycling, then it must surely help in full contact violent collision sports.

But I thought PED is mostly to help you heal from injuries, and not directly about muscle building.
 
Lance gets way too much shit.

"Our roided up guy beat your roided up guy" is the most accurate statement that pertains to the Armstrong doping debacle. Everyone who competed was on the shit and Lance still steam rolled them all, and I don't even give a shit about cycling.

Pretty much, everyone in cycling has been using for a long ass time too. The guy widely considered the greatest cyclist of all time is Eddie Merckx and he was busted for PED's about 3 times and that was all the way back in the 60's and 70's. All the cycling greats were on something, they just decided to make an example out of big bad Armstrong for winning the TdF 7 consecutive times.
 
Back
Top