D
Deleted member 159002
Guest
KZ2 and KZ3 are two of my favorite FPSs ever. How does Shadow Fall's campaign compare?
Mixed bag. But decent overall I'd say.
Has some exciting shootouts, and some good level design and doesn't hurt the game is gorgeous.
But it also gets repetitive at times, and has a few bad/boring missions.
How would you say it compares to 2 and 3?
Mixed bag. But decent overall I'd say.
Has some exciting shootouts, and some good level design and doesn't hurt the game is gorgeous.
But it also gets repetitive at times, and has a few bad/boring missions.
The segment where you have to control your character while he is free falling is atrocious IMO. A lot of trail and error, super annoying.
How would you say it compares to 2 and 3?
For me personally, I'd rank them 3, 2 then SF.
But overall i like them all, if you enjoy KZ its worth picking up. It just could have been better that's for sure.
One thing I loved about 2 and 3 was the large-scale battles of attrition between the ISA and Helghast. Is the gameplay formula pretty much the same in SF?
Yes, it has a lot of large/open scale battles. But you are mostly taking them on by yourself so it can be a challenge on higher difficulties. But your new companion OWL is useful as well and can hack things and take out enemies also.
Something that isn't brought up as much, is the whole mechanic of taking cover and shooting in first person was pretty much ignored in Shadowfall. I mean you CAN do it but there's far less things to take cover on, and the system itself just doesn't feel as fluid. Its as if they wanted you to take a more run and gun approach.
Just odd because that was one of the coolest features from KZ II and III.
Oooo, thanks for pointing that out. Part of what made KZ2 and 3 my favorite games was the emphasis on cover.
I'll probably get the game nonetheless.