Khamzat Will Most Likely Lose ...

Edward Henry Greb

The Pittsburg Windmill
Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2022
Messages
5,191
Reaction score
10,647
This is a make-or-break fight for both fighters.
  • Khamzat = a 1.5-round fighter.
  • Kamaru = a 5-round fighter.
  • Khamzat struggled with Gilbert Burns, for 3 straight rounds, it was an ordeal.
  • Kamaru struggled with Gilbert Burns, for 30 seconds, after which he pieced him up, and kicked his ass, finishing him.
Conclusion:
Khamzat Chimaev has about 1.5 rounds of "chance" against Usman, after which Usman's quality, experience, and longevity will break Chimaev into pieces.

Barring an early, quick, KO, I have Usman breaking Khamzat, who may soil the UFC floor by the pressure, especially if this is a 5-rounder.
 
Kamaru-Usman-082221.png
 
Usman is the sacrificial lamb, the perfect sacrifice to catapult Kamzhat to a title shot. Anyone else, does not sell, devours their new livestock, and could potentially upset Kamzhat. Usman is smaller, short notice, has the "champ" title attached to his name/resume, and will sacrifice himself for Kamzhats title shot.
 
Usman is old, almost 36. Two really bad knees, taking the fight on short notice vs a younger, bigger man who had a full camp. On top of this, Khamzat has fought at middleweight several times, has Usman ever?

It's the style and personality.

Khamzat is either going to score a sensational, early knockout — or he is going to fail to do so, and ultimately lose, based on experience and character.

Not a big fan of Usman, but he's got character, heart, and staying power.

I don't think Khamzat has any of these things, especially in the trenches.
 
Usman is old, almost 36. Two really bad knees, taking the fight on short notice vs a younger, bigger man who had a full camp. On top of this, Khamzat has fought at middleweight several times, has Usman ever?

Not only has Khamzat fought @ MW he has bulked up a shit ton since the Holland fight. Hes HOOGE.

ufc-star-khamzat-chimaev-shows-837200281.jpg


People will be shocked by size difference b/c Kamaru himself is a hooge WW
 
Last edited:
36. Messed up knees. Never fought at 185. Taking a short notice fight against a guy who is a natural Middleweight who has been bulking.

He's a lock. Definitely. Why?

Italicized letters and colorful words!
 
Pulling for Usman, but this is crazy.

I wonder how much the UFC is paying Usman for this.....

Khamzat is going to be rusty and maybe he'll get reckless enough for Usman to pull it off.
 
Last edited:
Usman is old, almost 36. Two really bad knees, taking the fight on short notice vs a younger, bigger man who had a full camp. On top of this, Khamzat has fought at middleweight several times, has Usman ever?
Kamaru is gonna look bad in this fight if it happens
 
Not only has Khamzat fought @ MW he has bulked up a shit ton since the Holland find. Hes HOOGE.

ufc-star-khamzat-chimaev-shows-837200281.jpg


People will be shocked by size difference b/c Kamaru himself is a hooge WW
  • "It ain't the size of the dog in the fight; it's the size of the fight in the dog."
    ~ Gen./Pres. Dwight D. Eisenhower
Khamzat barely beat Burns.
Kamaru had a brief "clip," then beat the absolute fog out of Burns.

Over time, Usman will break and expose the "deer-heart" in Chimaev.

Chimaev will prove to be a front-running cur, just like Conor.

Looks outstanding "when winning" .... but will always shit himself when facing a champion who won't quit.
 
If Khamzat fights smarter than he did against Burns, he willl win that fight and be offered a title shot
 
The only one who really loses... is us. For having to witness another one of your retarded threads. /ban

Retarded thread?

Ignorant, simpleton fog.

1. You have the ability to ignore.
2. You will have the obligation to come here, and apologize, when a tired/beaten Chimaev voids his feces, and submits to Usman.

Examine each's history, especially against their single/common opponent (Burns), and mark my words. (Chimaev barely escaped Burns; Usman destroyed him.)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top