***Khamzat vs Burns MEGATHREAD***

[Alexander_GOATanovski]

Very easy 29-28 fight to score for Chimaev

 

[Krixes]

No... It was close but not a robbery

 

[mirko>anyone]

No

 

[TheGreatA]

It was a close fight, could've gone either way really.

 

[Nightgunner05]

I put money on Burns, but he lost. It was close though.

 

[K-Bag]

I thought Burns took it but this wasn't a robbery.

 

[kingConor]

Colby is a way better matchup for him than burns

 

[MMABr]

No way Gilbert won the 3rd round. He got marched down and outstruck for the vast majority of it.

 

[Morning Star]

Lol, I can see why you're a pink belt. He won 1 & 3 clearly. 1 had the knockdown and 3 had Burns hurt badly.

 

[Usssssyyyy]

Nah he lost the fight when he chased that takedown and exhausted himself for a while and just ate shots against the cage. If he kept it standing he really could have won that.

 

[supnmunm]

Fights that close are never robberies. Why do people think everytime the guy who they thought won, loses, it's a robbery?

 

[BrockLesnarsTurtleBack]

Khamzat R1, Gilbert R2. R3 close.

 

[Pious Augustus]

Did anyone actually have Burns winning round 3?

Are you an actual MMA fan?

Yes his strikes were much better

 

[Pechan]

complete BS, Burns won rounds 2 and 3 clearly.

 

[Rationality]

29-28 Burns. No question.

 

[USA!USA!]

From a Burns fan.... no. Close fight, def not a robbery.

 

[D 1 Wrestler]

1 and 3 easy lol

 

[ChuFye]

no doubt about it

Dana paid out! Facttss

 

[Gilday]

A lot of Gilbert's big shots in that 3rd round were whiffed. You can argue 29-28 Gilbert if you want but to claim it was a robbery is just stupidity

 

[Dick Trickle]

Once I heard unananimous I knew Chimaev won. Burns earned at least a split decision, I had him winning the fight.