- Joined
- Jan 14, 2019
- Messages
- 343
- Reaction score
- 42
On the contrary, its brought up to point out the underlying question: what makes someone in a field great?
One possibility is greatness is about absolute performance -- who would win in head to head competition. A second possibility is that its about relative performance -- who did best against other people of their time. A third possibility is that its about advancing knowledge of the field -- who made the greatest relative change in knowledge (this is admittedly biased towards early practisioners).
You could argue that Rickson fails on all three -- that he would lose to current champions, that he didn't do exceptionally well against the guys of his time, and that he didn't advance BJJ much. That's different than what I'd heard during the 90's when BJJ first become widely known, but quite possible, back then the Web was just getting going and things like usnet were the main sources of information.
In terms of bringing up Newton, I chose him simply because every high school science student has heard of him -- there's nothing 'smart' about knowing who he is, 95% of humans on the planet over the age of 15 know of him. Einstein and Darwin would probably be the only other scientists who everyone knows, but they're harder to use for this kind of analogy.
I suppose I should have used Kano (the founder of judo) as a better analogy to BJJ. He's still considered one of the greatest judoka ever by judo people, even though his techniques have long since been surpassed and his absolute ability would have him losing badly in competition to modern competitors. If it comes up again I'll go that route. Not that Rickson was on Kano's level as an innovator, just as an example of the principle.
Seriously, I don't know much about Rickson; I was around in the 90's though, and what you heard back then was that he was a major driving force behind the development of pre-modern BJJ. Maybe that was just Gracie propaganda, but it was the common image.
BTW, you undervalue his influence. His physics for instance is central to all modern physics -- everything from statistical mechanics to electromagnetism to QM to relativity and of course classical mechanics (in the form of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics) rely on part on principles he discovered. Its why just about every professional physicist ranks him along with Einstein as the greatest physicist ever. What you take in Phys 101 is a tiny portion of what his work led to.
Don't forget Mifune the second toughest man in judo,
Good post and I agree with it but I also think Keenan has contributed more to submission grappling than he gets credit for.
Lot of versatility and creativity in these highlights and these are 4 years old.
We always underrate his no gi game which allow him to earn a podium at the ADCC worlds