Crime Judge who criticized Trump has her home burned down

Yeah, was incredibly unlikely to begin with just logistically because it's a small gated community surrounded by water and marsh with 1 entrance, and it happened at 11:30 in the morning with a bunch of people in the house.

They just wanted a whataboutism and to scream "both sides" so badly because of the preposterous streak of left wing terrorism that they didn't care about any evidence, and just jumped on the least likely scenario and jumped first to arson, then that it was politically motivated, and that it was politically motivated by a Trump supporter over a decision that already got overturned by a higher court, when their first assumption that they kept piling onto wasn't even true.

I'm glad they all got out, and one of the grossest parts is that this story will completely vanish now that it not only isn't politically useful anymore, but makes them look worse for making so many baseless assumptions.

You're deranged.

So someone's house burns down during a period of acute political instability, this leads to perfectly logical questions about whether there was any intentionality, but if it proves it's just a coincidence and an accident all along you want the story covered round the clock or it's "gross"?

What the heck is going on in your head?

The story got covered, if there's nothing more to it, there's nothing more to cover. What are you expecting to happen and, more importantly, why?

Maybe take a step back from your crusade.
 
You're deranged.

So someone's house burns down during a period of acute political instability, this leads to perfectly logical questions about whether there was any intentionality, but if it proves it's just a coincidence and an accident all along you want the story covered round the clock or it's "gross"?

What the heck is going on in your head?

The story got covered, if there's nothing more to it, there's nothing more to cover. What are you expecting to happen and, more importantly, why?

Maybe take a step back from your crusade.
Incredible that you need this explained to you, but it was ONLY a national news story in the first place, with a thread on here titled "Judge who criticized Trump has her home burned down", because of your gross hope that it was politically motivated arson. You don't actually care now that it isn't politically useful, the same way you don't care about any of the other 360,000 residential fires every year that are also not arson and not politically useful.

None of the publications or politicians who heavily implied or outright claimed it was a politically motivated attack will follow up by admitting that their assumptions were baseless and wrong or apologize for fake newsing everybody yet again.
 
Last edited:
Incredible that you need this explained to you, but it was ONLY a national news story in the first place, with a thread on here titled "Judge who criticized Trump has her home burned down", because of your gross hope that it was politically motivated arson. You don't actually care now that it isn't politically useful, the same way you don't care about any of the other 360,000 residential fires every year that are also not arson and not politically useful.

None of the publications or politicians who heavily implied or outright claimed it was a politically motivated attack will follow up by admitting that their assumptions were baseless and wrong or apologize for fake newsing everybody yet again.
Where's this energy when right wing media constantly gets it wrong about a shooter being trans?
 
I hope they have doctors in the reality you've created for yourself.
What do you mean? Steven crowder out there saying the Charlie Kirk shooter was trans and a bunch of outlets ran with it just an hour or two after it happened.
 
Well that's an odd thing to say.
The point is that’s the media environment we’re in now. Very reactionary and try to get clicks first. Don’t demand apologies when the entire right wing media runs with the trans did it after every shooting.
 
What do you mean? Steven crowder out there saying the Charlie Kirk shooter was trans and a bunch of outlets ran with it just an hour or two after it happened.

So 1 guy = the right wing media? Okay.

If you were being intellectually honest you would highlight the fact that the shooters BOYFRIEND was trans, but a few pundits inaccurately reported it as the shooter being trans - which isn't exactly difficult considering how many school shooters turn out to be trans recently.
 
So 1 guy = the right wing media? Okay.

If you were being intellectually honest you would highlight the fact that the shooters BOYFRIEND was trans, but a few pundits inaccurately reported it as the shooter being trans - which isn't exactly difficult considering how many school shooters turn out to be trans recently.
No it wasn’t one guy come on stop playing this game. You know very well after there’s a shooting the entire right on Sherdog is trying to link information to blame it on a trans person. Often these are from right wing sources that haven’t been able to verify anything. If you want accountability that’s one thing but having sky high expectations for your opposition and an absolutely no standards for how right wingers behave is a common theme I’ve been noticing.
 
No it wasn’t one guy come on stop playing this game. You know very well after there’s a shooting the entire right on Sherdog is trying to link information to blame it on a trans person. Often these are from right wing sources that haven’t been able to verify anything. If you want accountability that’s one thing but having sky high expectations for your opposition and an absolutely no standards for how right wingers behave is a common theme I’ve been noticing.

Whatever you say, Skippy.
 
Back
Top