Jesus was an important prophet in islam, so the blasphemy protection of the minority religion doesnt hit hard for me as the main reason.
But, blasphemy laws regardless of intent are beyond asinine
Think its a typo. Looks like a dude adding salt to food.Salt bae? A little help?
Then he will be like everyone that believes in him...brain not getting oxygen.

To be expected of @Yorkist
nWhy not just quote the posts and save everyone the unpleasantness of having to interact with you?Oh you weren't? Should I quote the posts?
Why not just quote the posts and save everyone the unpleasantness of having to interact with you?
Jesus is mentioned more in the Koran than Muhammad. Islam end game is the same as Christianity - Jesus comes back to fight the anti-christ and rule earth. Which makes me wonder why Muhammad is the "last prophet" when Jesus is going to be ressurected for the final battle.This is one of those rare instances where a predominantly Muslim society use blasphemy laws to go after people for non-Islamic blasphemy. It's the exception to the rule. And if the tables were flipped, i.e. a Christian media outlet poked fun at Islamic iconography, there would riots and possible killings; the reaction would be much severe.
Jesus is mentioned more in the Koran than Muhammad. Islam end game is the same as Christianity - Jesus comes back to fight the anti-christ and rule earth. Which makes me wonder why Muhammad is the "last prophet" when Jesus is going to be ressurected for the final battle.
I'll allow him his dicktuck. If he requests the quote, I'll show them.
Ragnarok is back on mobile.Sounds like some weird korean MMORPG
Canada just got rid of its blasphemy laws.. How sad is that lol but than again the passing of Motion 103 sets the ground work to reintroduce itNo, freedom of speech is more important than stupid blasphemy laws. Muslim countries are backwards and we should consider a travel ban on Jordan.
I love arguments with all types...thats why I post in the war room. Come on bro, with the amount of times we have clashed you should know this. I take pride in taking on what should be an un-winable argument to hone my critical thinking by trying to defend what I dont even believe.
I'm going to go against the grain here and say I think that's a legitimate reason to restrict speech. In the abstract I prefer very strong speech protections like we have in the US(and even we're not perfect) but at the same time I think that in practice certain countries might have certain sectarian or ethnic or religious divisions that are best not inflamed. Not sure Jordan is one of those countries but it might be. The problem is that even speech restrictions put in place for the "right" reasons can be abused and I can easily imagine the Jordanian government doing just that.