Dana trying to write this down in history as the greatest HW fight of all time, in a misguided attempt to Crown Jon Jones as the HW King for beating the UFC HW with the most title defenses.If this fight had happened a year ago with stipe I would have been interested. But after the injury and it being so long this fight makes no sense. It will look good having stipes name on his resume though in the long run. So I get it sort of.
He is def ducking but it's understandable. I'd choose to fight 42 year old too rather than the 30 year old killer as my retirement fight.
Sherdoggers just have double standards. Most people here would rather fight Stipe than Aspinall if they were in Jon's shoes.
Exactly.Him fighting Stipe isn’t a fight the fans clamor for, there’s enough duck going around that there is merit to it. I hope Stipe pulls off a convincing win.
That's literally what Jon suggested today in order to deny Poatan the chance at a 3rd real belt since Jon knows that would put Alex over him. Pretty pathetic IMOWhy not make Jones vs. Poatan for the BMF belt?
That would solve all these problems. It's a shiny new belt that has financial implications and prestige.
then they can promote Aspinall as undisputed HW champion and make Aspinall vs Gane/Volkov winner.
Jon has the right to fight Stipe. If you look at the timeline Aspinall was nowhere in the picture. Aspinall has no right to call out jones for fighting Stipe because the fight was booked before he was anything in the division. So the fight with Stipe is a fight that Aspinall has no relevance in. Now going forward after the Stipe fight, if jones does not defend against Aspinall than he has a right because currnetly has relevance as the next in line.
I do not get the Stipe over Aspinall nonsense. Aspinall was nowhere in sight when it was booked.
Really?That's literally what Jon suggested today in order to deny Poatan the chance at a 3rd real belt since Jon knows that would put Alex over him. Pretty pathetic IMO
Really?
Where did Joens say that
