• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Crime Joe pardons Hunter

He pardoned him for ANYTHING that may or may not be discovered for the last 10 years. In my opinion, that is a direct admission that the Burisma money was 100% corruption.


if pardons are a direct admission of guilt then what do you have to say about matt gaetz begging for one?

that's diffe(r)ent right?
 


This is one of biggest pardons in the history of the United States, it goes back to 2014 when Joe Biden was vice president. He trying to cover up his Burisma involvement.
 
My favorite part of this story is Dinesh D’Souza AKA the dude who made 2000 Mules then admitted it was fake, clutching pearls on social media over this. Dinesh was pardoned by Trump for his felonies he committed. His pearl clutching is peak political rage porn social media. Some bots replied they agreed with him but Dinesh should have sat this story out but knows he needs to feed his followers some rage to get clicks, he was OK with being a massive hypocrite.
Pardons need to go away but too late now, the Supreme Court has made it legal for a President to do whatever he wants.
Hell Trump pardoned his son in laws, father who he just made ambassador of France.

you love to see it.
 
<puhlease>

"Joe Biden's daughter Ashley Biden's diary claimed horrifying details of a "hyper-sexualized" childhood. Although, previously, its authenticity has been questioned, back in May 2024, Ashley herself confirmed in a court document made public that the contents of the diary are as real as Hunter Biden's laptop.

Apparently, in one of the excerpts from the diary entry, Ashley wrote about "showering with her dad" at an inappropriate age, fear of being "sexually abused" as a young girl and so much more. After the 43-year-old confirmed the authenticity of the diary's contents, people will demand answers from the White House, as per Daily Mail."


So spare us the 'It's the right-wingers who remember this story who are the real creeps' strategy you were just about to pathetically attempt.... and fail.

Are the published documents really from Ashley Biden's diary? Maybe. However, this hasn't been confirmed in any official capacity, basically all the sources claiming it was authenticated are partisan, and even an organization infamous for publishing false attacks on liberals wasn't comfortable publicizing such claims.

Ashley Biden really did have her diary stolen. There hasn't been any confirmation that any published excerpts from the diary are accurate from a source that could be considered reliable.

Ashley said it was stolen but that it's contents had been misrepresented to the public in an effort to harm those she loves.

"After being the victim of a crime in my early twenties, I developed PTSD. The journal that was stolen was part of my efforts to heal.
I am a private citizen, targeted only because my father happened to be running to be President. In other words, the extensive work I have done to move past my trauma was undone by Ms. Harris's actions. …
Although this criminal act happened more than three years ago, because of the publicity it drew—exactly as Ms. Harris intended—I am constantly re-traumatized by it. I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online.
Repeatedly, I hear others grossly misinterpret my once-private writings and lob false accusations that defame my character and those of the people I love."


Conservatives deal in bullshit.
 


This is one of biggest pardons in the history of the United States, it goes back to 2014 when Joe Biden was vice president. He trying to cover up his Burisma involvement.


hunter biden smoked some crack and bought a gun. absolutely terrible. people get prosecuted for that every single day and the prisons are quickly filling up. people need to stop smoking crack and buying guns.
 
hunter biden smoked some crack and bought a gun. absolutely terrible. people get prosecuted for that every single day and the prisons are quickly filling up. people need to stop smoking crack and buying guns.
Guns are another subject, but drug use should absolutely be managed differently without criminal prosecutions.
 
hunter biden smoked some crack and bought a gun. absolutely terrible. people get prosecuted for that every single day and the prisons are quickly filling up. people need to stop smoking crack and buying guns.
Joe Biden is responsible for the 1994 crime bill the locks up people smoking crack or doing other drugs.
 
Man, it's almost like these retards think we should put limits on the president's ability to pardon people.
 
Man, it's almost like these retards think we should put limits on the president's ability to pardon people.
That seems pretty bipartisan going through this thread, but this is the system in place. Can’t hate the players for playing the game.
 
Guns are another subject, but drug use should absolutely be managed differently without criminal prosecutions.

as a second amendment advocate who is all about guns, it warms the cockles of my heart to see other people i don't like out there getting arrested for buying guns after they smoked some crack a few days before. how dare he buy a gun in america.
 
I see more democrats complaining than Republicans. Most of us don’t give a shit and fully expected this.but carry on the bitch fest and have some cheese with your whine
Did you quote the right person?
Aaaanyhoo
 
For a 10 year period of time, and includes any crimes we do AND don't know about? This is setting a precedent, bud. What a lazy ass argument.
Ford gave Nixon a blanket pardon for an offense against the country that may have happened between, iirc, 1969-74

It's been done, and for shit that actually mattered lol
 
Joe simply changed his mind?

The pardon game has been a joke since day 1. Amazing how much hoopla this is causing lol
 
It's lawfare because they over-prosecuted relatively minor crimes for political purposes. I liken it similar to when they tried to impeach Clinton for the whole Monica Lewinsky ordeal.
Impeachment only applies to elected officials.
I didn't say anyone is above the law. They should be treated as any other person breaking the law. In normal circumstances, those crimes would be dealt as misdemeanors for regular people.
So your objection is just to the documents case, and just to it being a felony?
 
Back
Top