- Joined
- Jul 26, 2016
- Messages
- 7,986
- Reaction score
- 59
JJ vs Rose the most recent example, I was pissed they gave her an immediate rematch after getting KO'd by Rose in the 1st + tap to strikes + amnesia. But I must admit, sometimes it´s hard not to be biased and have double standards. For example, I was salty when Aldo didn't get his immediate rematch and very happy when Silva got his. But both got brutally KO'd.
But Aldo and Silva were 2 of the most dominant champs we´ve ever seen. How do you compare that kind of dominance of a decade and nearly a decade that Aldo and Silva represented, to let's say WMMA JJ vs Rose? I don´t know. But if JJ squeaks out a "majority split decision" and walks away with the belt, it´s gonna look unfair. But a trilogy right away? It would log jam the division.
I just feel like they´re making it the rule, what should be an exception for cases of extreme dominance like Silva, GSP, Aldo and Jones.
But what´s your opinion guys, is Woodley gonna be considered a dominant champ and RDA is gonna have to beat him twice????
Thoughts?
But Aldo and Silva were 2 of the most dominant champs we´ve ever seen. How do you compare that kind of dominance of a decade and nearly a decade that Aldo and Silva represented, to let's say WMMA JJ vs Rose? I don´t know. But if JJ squeaks out a "majority split decision" and walks away with the belt, it´s gonna look unfair. But a trilogy right away? It would log jam the division.
I just feel like they´re making it the rule, what should be an exception for cases of extreme dominance like Silva, GSP, Aldo and Jones.
But what´s your opinion guys, is Woodley gonna be considered a dominant champ and RDA is gonna have to beat him twice????
Thoughts?