Is UFC 200 fight card really bad?

  • Thread starter TRT Vitor The Phenom
  • Start date
T

TRT Vitor The Phenom

Guest
To be honest with you guys when they said "Diaz vs McGregor rematch main event on UFC 200" I said UFC 198 > UFC 200.
I love Diaz Bros (#nohomo) and would love to see how Nate will smash him again but... then thay said Jones vs DC. Fuck, I'm Jones fan, he's the best fighter ever and finally will take his belt back. Then I saw "thumbs down" on every youtube video promoting #200. What the hell? Now this card is damn good! I'm not talkin' about the only ME but we got a lot of amazing fights and ex-champs, 2 current champs and the one and only Jon Bones Jones.
They added Dillashaw already.

WHAT OTHER FIGHTS ARE YOU EXPECT ON THAT EVENT TO STFU FINALLY?
 
It's a great card, too to bottom.
 
The only people bitching are Mcgregor nuthuggers, hype/wwe gimps and casuals with join dates less than a year old.
 
UFC 200 v1.0 was good and UFC 200 v2.0 is just as good. If you dont like this card then maybe MMA isnt for you
 
Conor's fans? Maybe all of those Irish people who had already book nonrefundable flights to go almost halfway across the world to watch their homecountry hero fight are the ones disliking those videos?
 
The only people bitching are Mcgregor nuthuggers, hype/wwe gimps and casuals with join dates less than a year old.
Compared to the hype the card is underwhelming. If that is bitching than I don't fit any of your descriptions

but the card is obviously very good by any other standards than UFC trying to make it the greatest. They didn't succeed in that aspect.
 
Its not worthy of ufc 200 in comparison to the stacked card that was ufc 100.

Lady fights dont count as championship bouts

Rematch arnt that exciting most of the time (sonnen vs silva or gsp vs penn or edgar vs penn or silvia vs arlovski are the exceptions)

I hope they sell it, theyve been serving us shit on a plate for years and we keep buying it by habbit. I want pride back. I can deal with no name fighters if there were head kicks, ref cams, rings, booming voice little jap lady and steroids. Sigh....glory days
 
Anybody that calls 200 bad is functioning with a brain thats not working well.FOR FUCKS SAKE,IF 200 HAS THE STANDARD 5 FIGHT MAIN CARD then the prelims for 200 will be better and deeper thsn any fight night card on fox 1.,,,From 8-10 on July 9th ,the top 3-4 prelim fights could be main event for any fight night card...
Sage
Miller-gomi
Lauzon-sanchez
Pena-cat
Hendricks-gastellum
Tj-raphael
Mousasi-Brunson

Right now on sherdog bout order, they have Mousasi-Brunson as the first ppv fight but just heard that theyre looking to book one more main card fight so what the hell hsppens if that comes to fruition.
 
It's not bad. Expectations for the event were higher than what was achievable. You look at the fight cards leading up to that event, during that weekend and cards to follow it was only able to be stacked to a certain level. That's going to be great weekend for fight fans especially for those that will be in the middle of it all in Vegas.
 
If you don't like the UFC 200 card you don't like mma. You're either a media regurgitator (casual fan) or McGregor nuthuggers.
 
Short answer no, long answer no. Pretty sweet card all n' all.
 
Dont buy into what others think or their opinion on a UFC card. 200 is stacked & will sell more ppvs than 100. I'm loading up because I don't want to miss a single fight on that card
 
Compared to the hype the card is underwhelming. If that is bitching than I don't fit any of your descriptions

but the card is obviously very good by any other standards than UFC trying to make it the greatest. They didn't succeed in that aspect.

I agree it certainly isn't the greatest card or even in the top 5, but I still feel that the JJ vs DC main event made it better than the pointless Conor vs Nate rematch.
 
It is not bad, but I was expecting a lot better to be honest.
 
I wanted Conor on the card but not to fight Nate.
 
Back
Top