Social Is red blooded American consultant something news rooms will have?

[Nizam al-Mulk]

A journalistic ice breaker. A temporary gig for military veterans. gym rats and former athletes.

A journalistic outlet needs to do interview for example with red blooded American Male or wants to inititiate Contact. In order to make a good first impression they hire a temp who can vibe with the subject to make First Contact with Red Blooded American Male / Red Blooded Male / Amazon Woman. It does not matter if he / she is an athlete, a participant in the Ethiopian civil war /a business tycoon in a region where they think HR is exotic medicine.

Later after an initial good first impression was made they can use their typical journalist. Low t someone who is completely outside of any sort of honor culture.

Is this the future considering how newsrooms look now compared to the 90s, 80s and the 50s?

 

[fungi]

^

 

[Slobodan]

About 5-5:30?

 

[Tone C]

@NoGoodNamesLeft - you related ?

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

@NoGoodNamesLeft - you related ?

Ask the user if i am his / her soulmate.

^

You also really hate the current crop of journalists and think they make us dumber.

 

[fungi]

You also really hate the current crop of journalists and think they make us dumber.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

 

[fungi]

 

[I Am Legion]

Considering MSM is filled with liberal weirdos, I guess to have balance you would need to have the other side as well. I literally heard a woman on a news cast say everyone should ask people what their pronouns are before even saying hello.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

 

[fungi]

I'll repeat for you:

P.s. this is the end of our conversation.
Good day.

 

[jeff7b9]

No. That is not going to happen.


The disconnect in intentional.
It isn't going anywhere.

Until people firmly get a grasp that it is PROPAGANDA and not "news" they are doomed to be confused. Once you see it for what it actually is ...and only then, you can begin to have a realistic understanding of the intent and actions taking place.

40+ years ago- Sure. There was "news" and for the most part they presented information and left you to from your own opinions. That is simply not the case now. The objective is now and has been for a LONG TIME to utilize media to control public perception and alter and control public behavior and opinion. It isn't even remotely subtle.


This goes back a long way, but a pretty definitive starting point is "Operation Mockingbird" (1960s-70s) which is now a fully disclosed government (CIA) operation to implant CIA agents into the media and begin the process of using mass media as a tool for manipulation of publicly available information.

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

I'll repeat for you:

P.s. this is the end of our conversation.
Good day.

No. That is not going to happen.


The disconnect in intentional.
It isn't going anywhere.

Until people firmly get a grasp that it is PROPAGANDA and not "news" they are doomed to be confused. Once you see it for what it actually is ...and only then, you can begin to have a realistic understanding of the intent and actions taking place.

40+ years ago- Sure. There was "news" and for the most part they presented information and left you to from your own opinions. That is simply not the case now. The objective is now and has been for a LONG TIME to utilize media to control public perception and alter and control public behavior and opinion. It isn't even remotely subtle.


This goes back a long way, but a pretty definitive starting point is "Operation Mockingbird" (1960s-70s) which is now a fully disclosed government (CIA) operation to implant CIA agents into the media and begin the process of using mass media as a tool for manipulation of publicly available information.

40 years ago you had a lot less perspectives available right away.

Mass media was manipulating people before the 60s and 70s.

 

[NoGoodNamesLeft]

@NoGoodNamesLeft - you related ?

 

[Slothbroth]

Ban imo

 

[Jack Reacheround]

40 years ago you had a lot less perspectives available right away.

Mass media was manipulating people before the 60s and 70s.

I thought this thread couldn’t be any dumber. And then this happened.

“…*then ask him to let me run away.” That’s how that should read.

And it wasn’t until the 80s that “news” outlets could just blatantly lie to you. Because, you guessed it, Reagan repealed the Fairness Doctrine. Now news agencies can just straight up lie and be partisan.

 

[mixmastermo]

A journalistic ice breaker. A temporary gig for military veterans. gym rats and former athletes.

A journalistic outlet needs to do interview for example with red blooded American Male or wants to inititiate Contact. In order to make a good first impression they hire a temp who can vibe with the subject to make First Contact with Red Blooded American Male / Red Blooded Male / Amazon Woman. It does not matter if he / she is an athlete, a participant in the Ethiopian civil war /a business tycoon in a region where they think HR is exotic medicine.

Later after an initial good first impression was made they can use their typical journalist. Low t someone who is completely outside of any sort of honor culture.

Is this the future considering how newsrooms look now compared to the 90s, 80s and the 50s?

They have field agents that go to these types of events to collect data

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

And it wasn’t until the 80s that “news” outlets could just blatantly lie to you. Because, you guessed it, Reagan repealed the Fairness Doctrine. Now news agencies can just straight up lie and be partisan.

Why did the electorate not try to bring it back if it was that awesome?

They have field agents that go to these types of events to collect data

I was not talking about those type of events/

 

[mixmastermo]

Why did the electorate not try to bring it back if it was that awesome?


I was not talking about those type of events/

Well I am talking about those types of events. How are these red blooded Americans getting their message? You have entire mobs willing and ready to vote a certain way because they belong to said groups.

I will also point out this phenomenon also exists on the left....

 

[Nizam al-Mulk]

Well I am talking about those types of events. How are these red blooded Americans getting their message? You have entire mobs willing and ready to vote a certain way because they belong to said groups.

I will also point out this phenomenon also exists on the left....

This phenomenon being red blood or?