- Joined
- Mar 12, 2014
- Messages
- 12,931
- Reaction score
- 4,211
i suppose I'm asking who do you think is better of the two and would marloes defeat Ronda like HH did?
Marloes has never been an elite striker. She's competent, for sure, and probably has better than average striking defense for WMMA, but she's mainly a submission fighter.
Yes. She also won that fight by submission. She has wins over Roxy, Kaufman and Carmouche; I guess looking impressive is a subjective metric, but she has some big name wins. She's also one of those fighters who was unfortunately past their prime when MMA got popular enough to get noticed.Didn't she get out grappled and mounted easily by Carmouche back when Carmouche was still green and pretty inexperienced? I never saw the hype for Marloes honestly. She never has really look impressive, except agasint no-names.
She's the same age as HollyShe's also one of those fighters who was unfortunately past their prime when MMA got popular enough to get noticed.
Not all fighters peak at the same time. Marloes was at her best earlier in her carreer.She's the same age as Holly
I think marloes beats ronda, but not holly