- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 14,924
- Reaction score
- 2,530
I guess the bottom line is the only argument for Machida being better is pure speculation. Incidentally it's funny that at one time there was three weight classes between the two.
Machida is better. Anderson was good but spent 10 years fighting cans. Machida has been stellar in a much harder division, and has only 3 legit loses(Jones and Shogun(x2 ).
And yet Machida still fought a better and higher level of competition then did Anderson.
lol...while he was boring us to tears with his tepid performances against leites(who choked out drew mcfedries),cote(who had to beat ricardo almeida to earn his shot),and maia(who beat dan miller to earn a shot) machida was taking on guys who were head hunting for him like rampage,shogun,jones,and plenty of others.
how would anderson do against jones,rampage,and shogun?
I guess the bottom line is the only argument for Machida being better is pure speculation. Incidentally it's funny that at one time there was three weight classes between the two.
But the facts are Silvas opponents were top contenders and Silva beat them, where Machida took many losses.
Beat all but Jones. Rather easily embarrass Rampage.
Give me a break bro. I know you will make all the excuses in the world, but you can't call someone like Griffin a can while considering Shogun and Rampage great wins when Griffin beat both of those guys all in that same era.
if anderson was as sure as you were,he would have fought them allready instead of fighting TUF finalists
Shogun absolutely smoked Griffin in the rematch when his knees were actually holding up for five minutes, and the Rampage decision was a joke, Rampage dropped him like 12 times.
Machida>Anderson.
Because Machida is at LHW. Same reason why Machida didn't fight the top MWs at that time. It really isn't too hard to see.
No. Although very similar, Silva is more creative with his strikes and has shown a more well-rounded game.