What are you talking about? Weidman looked sharp in that fight.
The only fight he clearly lost was to Whitaker. Gastellum and Romero fights were 50/50 imo
Hadn't Weidman just finished Gastelum just before losing to Jacare?Yeah sure, I never said he looked bad. I said he's been on a slump, which he has, be I said his best days are past him, which they are. Hasn't Wideman been knocked out in 4 of his last 5 fights? I don't think 'looking sharp' makes up for that.
Good but not great, some would even say gate keeper if it wasnt jacare being discussedSo losing to the top-3 guys in your division (2/3 were very close) means you're overrated and not great. <45>
IMO Jacare is in a similar situation to John Lineker where a LOT of people pull-out against them so they end up fighting low-ranking replacements and never gaining momentum.
Yeah sure, I never said he looked bad. I said he's been on a slump, which he has, be I said his best days are past him, which they are. Hasn't Wideman been knocked out in 4 of his last 5 fights? I don't think 'looking sharp' makes up for that.
Jacare is in a similar boat, still very good, still high level but certainly in the decline and nearing the end of their careers. Wideman is never getting to the title again, unless he fills in last minuet for someone dropping out, and if Jacare loses his next fight it will be the same for him
You, sir, are a true imbecile.