Is it time to add some rounds to championship fights?

Have people throw things into the cage every now and then.

Baseball bat wrapped in barbed wire, scramble to grab it etc

Steal chair next round.

Shield the next
 
I say we make championship bouts 3 stages of hell; after each victory the competitors get. 15 minutes of rest then fight again. best out of 3 fights takes it
 
Make all fights five rounds BUT

(1) Open scoring between rounds

(2) First to win three rounds wins the fight. This will encourage fighters to not take rounds off. Every round counts. You cant afford to give any round away. Like real sports where they have a best of five or best of seven series.

the problem is it favors front runners who don't have to focus on endurance. tough fighters who endure punishment as part of their strategy will automatically lose lots of their fights and so would a lot of slow starting endurance fighters.
 
Why not just make all matches 5 rounders, including the prelims (5 minutes each)? That way the UFC can really test which fighters are contender/championship material or just journeyman material that's eventually going to be turned into a tomato can somewhere down the line.

For the championship rounds, make rounds 10 minutes each.
 
So because Colby did not do enough to win in five rounds and could have potentially gone three more rounds TS believes we should extend championship fights?

<45>

I am no Usman fan but this is some ridiculous logic/coping mechanism from Colby fans.

Your guy lost, he deserved to lose, you don't clown around the first two rounds and start taking a championship fight seriously only when you get dropped for the first time. He gave away the first two rounds to Kamaru on a silver platter.

Colby is never going to be WW champion, he doesn't fight like a champion nor does he have the skillset of a WW champion, and despite what the commentators say to make his fanboys (like you TS) feel better he is not the second best WW. Colbys skills have regressed due to his inactivity and lack of training.

I hope for Colbys sake he retires because the guy who fought last night was was not worthy of sharing the octagon with Usman who was very gracious after all the trash Colby talked for seemingly no reason since he had nothing to back it up.

Id rather see Covington go out with his head held high than go out on a stretcher when a very motivated Masvidal knocks him out because that is how a fight between him and Masvidal will end if the guy who showed up last night shows up to fight Jorge Masvidal.

You consistently have some of the worst opinions on here. So Colby damn near beats Usman and this is proof that a guy who got smashed by Usman would beat him?

Ok maked total sense
 
I feel like we're getting too many close five rounders nowadays. That s ok when it's just a fight but it kinda takes something away when it's a fight for the title as in usman colby 2.
I mean you could clearly see that momentum was shifting towards colby and both fighters still had gas
in their tank.

Lengthening the 1st round to 10minutes would be better.
 
Make all fights five rounds BUT
(2) First to win three rounds wins the fight. This will encourage fighters to not take rounds off. Every round counts. You cant afford to give any round away. Like real sports where they have a best of five or best of seven series.

Nah, yo can have a guy win 3 close rounds and take away the fading in late rounds factor as well as submisison ko finish.

I mean Silva vs Sonnen was not even close for the first 4 rounds and still had a legit win over Sonnen who basically lay and pray is way for 4 rounds.
 
I feel like we're getting too many close five rounders nowadays. That s ok when it's just a fight but it kinda takes something away when it's a fight for the title as in usman colby 2.
I mean you could clearly see that momentum was shifting towards colby and both fighters still had gas
in their tank.

Have you never heard of a championship boxing match?
 
The events will be too long imo. It's already long enough.
 
Make all fights five rounds BUT

(1) Open scoring between rounds

(2) First to win three rounds wins the fight. This will encourage fighters to not take rounds off. Every round counts. You cant afford to give any round away. Like real sports where they have a best of five or best of seven series.
Bad idea
 
Nah, yo can have a guy win 3 close rounds and take away the fading in late rounds factor as well as submisison ko finish.

I mean Silva vs Sonnen was not even close for the first 4 rounds and still had a legit win over Sonnen who basically lay and pray is way for 4 rounds.

That's an argument for making fights 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20 rounds.

If fighters know ahead of time that to win they need to be the first to win three rounds, game plans will change accordingly. It won't stop close rounds from ever happening. But imagine the first round is close, both fighters will come out like mad men in the second. And both will come out like mad men in the third because the loser of the second feels he needs to win while the winner of the second feels he needs to secure the win.
 
Make all fights five rounds BUT

(1) Open scoring between rounds

(2) First to win three rounds wins the fight. This will encourage fighters to not take rounds off. Every round counts. You cant afford to give any round away. Like real sports where they have a best of five or best of seven series.
Fighting its not a "ball sport", fights can end in 1 minute or have no action for 25 minutes, same goes for those final minutes when finishes have happened.
 
These events already go too long. They need to think of ways to SHORTEN the broadcast, not lengthen it. For one, they should het rid of 2 fights off the early prelims.
 
I like the idea of one 25 minute round.
 
Only reason I'd favour an extra round in 3 or 5 round fights is if a fight is called an unanimous draw
 
That's an argument for making fights 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20 rounds.

If fighters know ahead of time that to win they need to be the first to win three rounds, game plans will change accordingly. It won't stop close rounds from ever happening. But imagine the first round is close, both fighters will come out like mad men in the second. And both will come out like mad men in the third because the loser of the second feels he needs to win while the winner of the second feels he needs to secure the win.
Your idea is fucking genius, and the arguments you are getting against it are weak shit.
 
Back
Top