Is Darren Till Actually Ranked #4??? Is So, This is #1 BULL$#!T!!!

Kung Fu Kowboy said:
Romero was top 3 and hadn't won a fight since the 1800's....
Click to expand...

Mohawk Banditó said:
Who you lose to matters. Till lost to the number 1 contender/former champ. Romero had 4 big losses but was still highly ranked. Gas only lost to high ranked guys. This isn't new. Woodley's on a 3 fight skid, but all against the 3 highest ranked guys at welterweight, so he stays ranked, even though he looks like ass. I mean where would you put Till without completely overhauling the ranking methods
Click to expand...

VinceArch said:
His cult fanbase on here though will try and tell you different.
Click to expand...
LMAO!! Don't bring up Yoel as if it's even remotely the same. Yoel has many top wins in devastating fashion. And ALL of his so called losses were to champions and #1 contenders. Guys who had never loss at 185.

And even more importantly you could make an argument that he didn't lose ANY of those fights. They were all close to draws.

Till on the other hand is 1/1 at 185. Even though I think he was impressive you could also argue that both fights were a bit lackluster in large part due to him. Again he shouldn't be ranked over Jack fir losing to Rob. You guys wanna put shit inyo perspective??? He took on Whittaker after Whittaker got KOed 2× by Adesanya and went 10 rounds with Yoel, not to mention a mental burnout.

If you compare Till to Yoel again, I'll smack you myself. Send location.
 
GoshiShun17 said:
LMAO!! Don't bring up Yoel as if it's even remotely the same. Yoel has many top wins in devastating fashion. And ALL of his so called losses were to champions and #1 contenders. Guys who had never loss at 185.

And even more importantly you could make an argument that he didn't lose ANY of those fights. They were all close to draws.

Till on the other hand is 1/1 at 185. Even though I think he was impressive you could also argue that both fights were a bit lackluster in large part due to him. Again he shouldn't be ranked over Jack fir losing to Rob. You guys wanna put shit inyo perspective??? He took on Whittaker after Whittaker got KOed 2× by Adesanya and went 10 rounds with Yoel, not to mention a mental burnout.

If you compare Till to Yoel again, I'll smack you myself. Send location.
Click to expand...
What do Till and Romero have in common? They both only have 1 win in their last few fights.
 
VinceArch said:
What do Till and Romero have in common? They both only have 1 win in their last few fights.
Click to expand...
Again, Yoel has many wins over the best 185ers ever. Till has 1 win. Till has been stopping in devastating fashion in 2 of his last losses. Dropped in 3 of them.

Yoel's last 3 losses were ALL highly debatable. Even the one against my favorite fighter.

Yoel had a much stronger argument for his ranking. He got cut because the old man was bad fir business. The argument for Till is WEAK. Matter of fact, just send location.
 
sampuncher said:
It's a load of crap but it's the UFC rankings so I'm not gonna take it all too seriously.

Till and Vettori have the same amount of top 15 wins at MW between them so it's kinda splitting hairs a bit. Neither should really be ranked that high.
Click to expand...

Vetori just beat the #4 ranked guy...so he should take his place at that ranking...you should become the ranking of the guy you beat. who has till beat?
 
GoshiShun17 said:
LMAO!! Don't bring up Yoel as if it's even remotely the same. Yoel has many top wins in devastating fashion. And ALL of his so called losses were to champions and #1 contenders. Guys who had never loss at 185.

And even more importantly you could make an argument that he didn't lose ANY of those fights. They were all close to draws.

Till on the other hand is 1/1 at 185. Even though I think he was impressive you could also argue that both fights were a bit lackluster in large part due to him. Again he shouldn't be ranked over Jack fir losing to Rob. You guys wanna put shit inyo perspective??? He took on Whittaker after Whittaker got KOed 2× by Adesanya and went 10 rounds with Yoel, not to mention a mental burnout.

If you compare Till to Yoel again, I'll smack you myself. Send location.
Click to expand...
What a coincidence, Till's only "so called loss" (good word usage for a bitch, I think I'll use it, thanks) at MW is to the former champion Whittaker. His other losses were to champs and contenders too.

You wanna put shit into perspective? Till was killing himself to make a weight he shouldn't have and it caused a lot of damage and made it easy to knock him out, but now he's doing much better at MW, taking a clear victory over a guy who was #4, then a close competitive loss he could have won against a former champ & #1 contender. Seems like you just have a problem with using your perspective laterally.
 
kalabula said:
Why? Isn’t it true?
Click to expand...
He's just mad that, even after 2 attempts by Yoel, Darren got closer to beating Whittaker than Romero did.

BRASIL WAND said:
He’s 1-3 in his last 4 BUT the UFC needs a relevant British fighter for that market.


Lol @ people who don’t realize UFC rankings is a marketing tool rather than a serious ranking system.
Click to expand...
Oh, it's absolutely a marketing tool, but I think it's a lost sadder not to realize that you can count your ten fingers, and rank which ones are your favorites, then if you cut off your favorite finger, not understand how your 4th favorite finger became your third favorite finger.

"What? I don't understand! My finger isn't any cooler than it was 10 seconds ago! Do I not understand elementary school math because of the blood loss, or because I'm retarded?"
 
Mohawk Banditó said:
What a coincidence, Till's only "so called loss" (good word usage for a bitch, I think I'll use it, thanks) at MW is to the former champion Whittaker. His other losses were to champs and contenders too.

You wanna put shit into perspective? Till was killing himself to make a weight he shouldn't have and it caused a lot of damage and made it easy to knock him out, but now he's doing much better at MW, taking a clear victory over a guy who was #4, then a close competitive loss he could have won against a former champ & #1 contender. Seems like you just have a problem with using your perspective laterally.
Click to expand...
Who you calling bitch? Send location. Again being ultimately 1/1 should not put him over guys with multiple top wins at middleweight. He shouldn't have jumped over The Joker who beat Gastelum more impressively than Till. And Vettori should be ranked ahead as well. I'm aware that Till was cutting too much weight. But if you think THAT is the reason Masvidal KOed him then you aren't as bright as you think you are friend.

Besides, when was it ever "easy" to KO Till? You are making excuses for your boy with that irrelevant argument.

According to this goofy logic you guys are using, we may as well have Vettori ranked #2 for taking Adesanya to a split decision. Lol GTFO. Fall back homie.
 
BRASIL WAND said:
He’s 1-3 in his last 4 BUT the UFC needs a relevant British fighter for that market.


Lol @ people who don’t realize UFC rankings is a marketing tool rather than a serious ranking system.
Click to expand...
I realize but every once in a while they go too far.
 
GoshiShun17 said:
Again, Yoel has many wins over the best 185ers ever. Till has 1 win. Till has been stopping in devastating fashion in 2 of his last losses. Dropped in 3 of them.

Yoel's last 3 losses were ALL highly debatable. Even the one against my favorite fighter.

Yoel had a much stronger argument for his ranking. He got cut because the old man was bad fir business. The argument for Till is WEAK. Matter of fact, just send location.
Click to expand...
57046238.jpg
 
GoshiShun17 said:
Who you calling bitch? Send location...
Besides, when was it ever "easy" to KO Till? You are making excuses for your boy with that irrelevant argument.
Click to expand...
He's not my boy. I said after the Vettori win that Marvin should be number 4, then Joker, then Till. I'm just telling you that 4 isn't egregious. He lost to #1 and beat #8, so he's gotta fit in there somewhere. So I can repeat my question if you want to actually answer it this time
"Where would you put Till without completely overhauling the ranking methods?"

yP2876v.png

ExaltedMediumAnnashummingbird-size_restricted.gif
 
Mohawk Banditó said:
He's not my boy. I said after the Vettori win that Marvin should be number 4, then Joker, then Till. I'm just telling you that 4 isn't egregious. He lost to #1 and beat #8, so he's gotta fit in there somewhere. So I can repeat my question if you want to actually answer it this time
"Where would you put Till without completely overhauling the ranking methods?"

yP2876v.png

ExaltedMediumAnnashummingbird-size_restricted.gif
Click to expand...
Lol where you wanna meet? I'm in Jersey too. Linden to be exact.

But, yes I'd put Till right behind Vettori and Jack. He's top 10 but definitely not top 4 or 5. The fact of the matter is he just hasn't done enough of anything yet.

The skills are there perhaps, not everyone agrees. But the The accomplishments are certainly NOT.
 
GoshiShun17 said:
Lol where you wanna meet? I'm in Jersey too. Linden to be exact.

But, yes I'd put Till right behind Vettori and Jack. He's top 10 but definitely not top 4 or 5. The fact of the matter is he just hasn't done enough of anything yet.

The skills are there perhaps, not everyone agrees. But the The accomplishments are certainly NOT.
Click to expand...
Aw shit man, my little bro teaches in Elizabeth.
Jersey sucks sometimes, don't it?

Yeah, I don't know if it's right, but the rankers consider even big losses an 'accomplishment.' So that's why some of these old bastards never fall out of the ranking. I mean, as long as they're using the same shit logic, I can't be mad, even if it is kinda shit


*edit* I'd hit ya back with a like, but I'm all out. I'll come back to it
 
Mohawk Banditó said:
Aw shit man, my little bro teaches in Elizabeth.
Jersey sucks sometimes, don't it?

Yeah, I don't know if it's right, but the rankers consider even big losses an 'accomplishment.' So that's why some of these old bastards never fall out of the ranking. I mean, as long as they're using the same shit logic, I can't be mad, even if it is kinda shit
Click to expand...
These taxes and cost of living damn sure do. But most of my family is here including all of my immediate family so I ain't going no where anytime soon.
 
UFC rankings are terrible, Till should be ranked outside top 15 tbh
 
GoshiShun17 said:
LMAO!! Don't bring up Yoel as if it's even remotely the same. Yoel has many top wins in devastating fashion. And ALL of his so called losses were to champions and #1 contenders. Guys who had never loss at 185.

And even more importantly you could make an argument that he didn't lose ANY of those fights. They were all close to draws.

Till on the other hand is 1/1 at 185. Even though I think he was impressive you could also argue that both fights were a bit lackluster in large part due to him. Again he shouldn't be ranked over Jack fir losing to Rob. You guys wanna put shit inyo perspective??? He took on Whittaker after Whittaker got KOed 2× by Adesanya and went 10 rounds with Yoel, not to mention a mental burnout.

If you compare Till to Yoel again, I'll smack you myself. Send location.
Click to expand...

He had a closer fight with Rob than Cannonier did tbf.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,312
Messages
58,274,932
Members
175,989
Latest member
gorakk

Share this page

Back
Top