1. Where did your likes go? Please Read This Thread »

Is Conor taking the Nate fight a bad business decision for him?

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by Combat Wombatt, Feb 24, 2016.

  1. Combat Wombatt Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,919
    Likes Received:
    0
    I love the fact that Conor is willing to take on Nate at WW (some may say that he ducked Khabib, either way, he's taking on a dangerous opponent). That's a big jump against an opponent with a size and reach advantage who is also a striker. Nate also has a dangerous ground game and we haven't seen great ground defense from Nate. I have a feeling if Nate got Conor down and Nate's on top or even bottom it wouldn't be long before he had Conor tapping.

    Conor had big money fights with RDA, Frankie, and Aldo lined up in the future. A Conor loss would take away his undefeated status in the UFC and obviously drop some of his marketability, even it if was in a higher weight class. If Conor loses far less people may pay to see him fight Lawlor or RDA and only want him to fight at FW.

    Conor could have just dropped out also and waited to fight RDA when RDA was heeled or fight Frankie or Aldo (rematch) eventually.


    Do you think Conor taking the Nate fight is a bad business decision?



    I say it's all about the outcome of the fight. If Conor wins people say of course Conor can fight at FW, LW, and WW. If Conor loses people may say he needs to stay at FW and has no business fighting at LW and WW.
     
  2. thewhiterooster dana hates sunscreen

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    3,800
    Likes Received:
    9
    given the circumstance, no it's not a bad business decision. especially because he should definitely beat a nate diaz that has two weeks notice. but the fight will be hyped well. people will tune in for the shit talking. and that'll translate into lotsa $ for that annoying irish dork.
     
  3. HHJ Fedor Supremacist Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    80,829
    Likes Received:
    151
    Location:
    Ultima Thule
    Ill answer that question in a few days lol
     
  4. Senzo Tanaka Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    14,166
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's risky but it's a warm up to see how he feels at 170 and he will make millions. If he loses, he's still champion and can still try for 155. It's a test for sure.
     
  5. Aerose91 Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    2,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not if he wins it
     
  6. Andre Xiong Silver Belt Professional Fighter

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,781
    Likes Received:
    0
    bad? no, a win over Nate would solidify and legitimize his LW title shot (it was gifted title shot prior to this).

    worse than had it been RDA, definitely. RDA was for the belt.
     
  7. Blanqa Blanqua Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2013
    Messages:
    15,466
    Likes Received:
    40
    If he beats him it's the perfect set up for fighting Lawler at UFC 200.

    It's smart.
     
  8. Wallop Blue Belt

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    762
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    'Burbs, UK
    This is one big costume drama.
    Conor gives Nate an opportunity.
    I don't think it's bad business. McG hasn't decided to wait for RTA (road traffic accident) so will keep his impetus going. He'll probably win quite dramatically too - not threatening his position as arguably the division's best and increase his highlight showreel at the same time.
    He may also increase his fan base as everybody loves watching a real banger.....
    Add to that the trash talk and the recipe is there for.
     
  9. soulsstealer Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2013
    Messages:
    11,545
    Likes Received:
    2
    Nope. Conor will make millions from this fight. In business if you make millions you are doing the right thing. There is always risk in losing you cant be afriad not to take a fight. Lastly people watch conor fight its doesnt matter who his opponent is, frankie, aldo etc are not big fights, only since they are vs conor are they worth anything.
     
  10. Combat Wombatt Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,919
    Likes Received:
    0

    You don't want to think short term. He could make money on this fight but lose the big money if he loses and doesn't fight RDA or Lawler.
     
  11. Rvd Slmr Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    12,763
    Likes Received:
    162
    Location:
    France
    Conor's belt isn't on the line and the fight isn't in his usual weight classes, he has nothing to lose.
     
  12. basherofbrains Green Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    The is a flaw in your argument. Conor is like to make MORE off of this fight that he would have fighting RDA That is why he picked Nate, he wanted a better draw.
     
  13. honzo Black Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    5,483
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think it matters.
    The ufc love Conor, he'll be looked after
     
  14. surgeyou1 Welcome to the Machida Era...Part Deux

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2013
    Messages:
    23,840
    Likes Received:
    16
    Easy 5-10 million dollars to beat up a stuck in the mud Diaz?

    Lol
     
  15. djacobox372 Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,802
    Likes Received:
    11
    Seems to me like Nate knew he was the backup and was willing to fight at 155.

    My guess is that the UFC insisted on 170 to give conor an excuse if he lost and keep his challenge for the 155lb title still marketable.
     
  16. WallyBear I am the liquor.

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2013
    Messages:
    8,202
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Krautland
    Depends on his time preference when it comes to money.

    He will still be a big draw with a loss - he's still the FW champion.
     
  17. Team Sleep Black Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    5,002
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Not getting a 10 million dollar payday when you spend like Conor does would be almost as terrible of a business decision as the spending itself.
     
  18. lostdog000 Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    16,820
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    They Came Together (2014) - IMDb
    takin it at 170 to convienience nate was a bad move
     
  19. IndyCovaHart Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    23,123
    Likes Received:
    95
    Fuck "business."

    GSP was "business" oriented and because of that we were treated to judge's decisions and deprived of super fights.

    Win or lose, Conor's stock goes up in my book.

    A fighter who takes on all comers irrespective of weight class with minimal notice and stays active is a fan's dream come true.
     
  20. helltoupee Black Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2015
    Messages:
    7,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    on one wheel
    He's fighting another LW fighter @ 170. He's not fighting a WW fighter. Conor has nothing to lose. If Nate is somehow able to pull off the win, the UFC and Conor will just come back and say that Conor is a FW who bravely took on a WW to save the card.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.