- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 5,295
- Reaction score
- 369
I love the fact that Conor is willing to take on Nate at WW (some may say that he ducked Khabib, either way, he's taking on a dangerous opponent). That's a big jump against an opponent with a size and reach advantage who is also a striker. Nate also has a dangerous ground game and we haven't seen great ground defense from Nate. I have a feeling if Nate got Conor down and Nate's on top or even bottom it wouldn't be long before he had Conor tapping.
Conor had big money fights with RDA, Frankie, and Aldo lined up in the future. A Conor loss would take away his undefeated status in the UFC and obviously drop some of his marketability, even it if was in a higher weight class. If Conor loses far less people may pay to see him fight Lawlor or RDA and only want him to fight at FW.
Conor could have just dropped out also and waited to fight RDA when RDA was heeled or fight Frankie or Aldo (rematch) eventually.
Do you think Conor taking the Nate fight is a bad business decision?
I say it's all about the outcome of the fight. If Conor wins people say of course Conor can fight at FW, LW, and WW. If Conor loses people may say he needs to stay at FW and has no business fighting at LW and WW.
Conor had big money fights with RDA, Frankie, and Aldo lined up in the future. A Conor loss would take away his undefeated status in the UFC and obviously drop some of his marketability, even it if was in a higher weight class. If Conor loses far less people may pay to see him fight Lawlor or RDA and only want him to fight at FW.
Conor could have just dropped out also and waited to fight RDA when RDA was heeled or fight Frankie or Aldo (rematch) eventually.
Do you think Conor taking the Nate fight is a bad business decision?
I say it's all about the outcome of the fight. If Conor wins people say of course Conor can fight at FW, LW, and WW. If Conor loses people may say he needs to stay at FW and has no business fighting at LW and WW.