In reality, names on paper isn’t the real story, it’s what happened in the fight. Tell me right now that you don’t believe judges ever make mistakes and I’ll concede the argument to youFixed it for you....back to reality and not fantasy land
yoel:
tavares
brunson
kennedy
machida
weidman
rockhold
Losses to Izzy, Costa, Whitaker 2x,
adesanya:
Romero
tavares
brunson
kelvin
whittaker 2x
vettori 2x
cannonier
pereira
Anderson
Costa
losses to pereira and Strickland
Not to mention Izzy's wins came in title fights.
Yes, I legitimately do believe yoel is the second greatest middleweight of all time, for all the reasons I laid outSome of you guys are so easily baited. No one in the world legitimately thinks Yoel is the second best MW.
Im from New Zealand, no disdain.
I just felt like once again Izzy was backing up like he has in his last three fights. Pereira landed good shots prior to being KOd.
Had Pereira been a little more measured/patient like he trained Strickland to do hed have been a lot more successful.
Izzys fought from HW to MW his whole combat career. Very little if any advantage for Pereira imo
How is the winner of a fight decided? By the judging criteria or by the opinions of 3 people sitting cageside?
Do judges ever make mistakes in your eyes?Sure! You’re not a judge lol
Some of you guys are so easily baited. No one in the world legitimately thinks Yoel is the second best MW.
So judges are perfect in your eyes?See @RonDante, you're officially alone
Anyway, this is entertaining and I love watching you trying to demonstrate something that doesn't make any sense
So judges are perfect in your eyes?
Ye becuase I watched the fights. Why can’t he win all the close fights? Is there a reason other than “well ummm you can’t just give him all the wins cause they were close”? Seriously? you sound like one of those “you gotta beat the champ to be the champ” or “you can’t back up and win” types of people with all these odd rules that just needlessly complicate things, you can win 3 close fights in a rowIn your eyes, Romero has won all the close fights he's been in. In your eyes, you think you're the better judge. You're not.
Personally I dont think so, If izzy can reclaim the title he passes silva or is atleast neck/neckHe's the clear number 2 middleweight of all time, but still a ways away from Anderson
Lmfao at losses to whittaker what a fucking joke.Pereira, Whittaker once, cannonier, brunson, vettori, gastelum
losses to yoel, Whittaker, pereira and strickland
alternating wins and losses for his last 10 fights
some of the worst fights ever even when he wins like vettori and cannonier
been soundly outclassed multiple times
I don’t like him specifically becuase I saw him getting gifted decisions twice. Plus his boring wins over marvin and jared just made it more annoying. it’s like god was gifting him the belt no matter what so he never had to be exciting, but could always trash talk and hype the fight up like it was going to be a barn burnerLmfao a losses to whittaker what a fucking joke.
Just say you Don't like izzy.
Some of you guys are so easily baited. No one in the world legitimately thinks Yoel is the second best MW.
Izzy beat whittaker 48-47 atleast with 49-46 and 50-45 being reasonable scores.I don’t like him specifically becuase I saw him getting gifted decisions twice. Plus his boring wins over marvin and jared just made it more annoying. it’s like god was gifting him the belt no matter what so he never had to be exciting, but could always trash talk and hype the fight up like it was going to be a barn burner
Ye becuase I watched the fights. Why can’t he win all the close fights? Is there a reason other than “well ummm you can’t just give him all the wins cause they were close”? Seriously? you sound like one of those “you gotta beat the champ to be the champ” or “you can’t back up and win” types of people with all these odd rules that just needlessly complicate things, you can win 3 close fights in a row
I never watched his fight versus till but losing to yoel was pretty clearIzzy beat whittaker 48-47 atleast with 49-46 and 50-45 being reasonable scores.
I'm Used to people always giving whittaker every benefit of the doubt anyway. He lost to till and Yoel in the rematch and very obviously thoroughly outclassed by Izzy but like brandon moreno, he wins every "close fight"
in the fans eyes, even if it's not actually close (like izzy vs Whittaker 2, Figgy vs Moreno 3)
And izzy actually is a more exciting fighter than whittaker, vettori or cannonier. his fights are boring cause his opponents are shook. The fights are good are the ones with alex, costa and gastelum because they weren't NEARLY as opposed to getting hit.
He can win all the close fights if he did slightly more than his opponents in the swing rounds"why can't he win all the close fights?"
Well if you're arguing like that I'll do the same : "why can't he lose all the close fights?"
Can't you see you make a fool of yourself in this thread? It's such a desperate stretch that one of the mods think you are trolling.
It's OK, you can have an unpopular opinion. Just admit there's no rational thinking behind it and that you're biased. You love Romero and you hate Adesanya we get it.