• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Interview with inbred family

I watched a few of those sex offender stories. The one with that fat white lady was very disturbing she should be locked up still :cool:
 
I know war room is that way but









Looks like an average republican family to me *rimshot*
 
Last edited:
That's not entirely true. Studies on parent child bonding have shown that having children that look like you improve bonding and nurturing of children. There was a study in Iceland showing that the sweet spot in human genetics is slightly past second cousin.

The healthiest and most asthetically beautiful populations are those of mass miscegenation. Hispanic, Berber, Desi, Slavic.

Parts of the world where different ethnicities constantly took control of.
 
Last edited:
The healthiest and most asthetically beautiful populations are those of mass miscegenation. Hidpanic, Berber, Desi, Slavic.

Parts of the world where different ethnicities constantly took control of.

Wrong, the healthiest populations are the Northern Europeans and the Japanense, hardly areas of mass miscegenation.

The populations you list are actually pretty low on the health spectrum.
 
Wrong, the healthiest populations are the Northern Europeans and the Japanense, hardly areas of mass miscegenation.

The populations you list are actually pretty low on the health spectrum.

Those areas have the highest HDI. Once you standardize for income per capita and access to essentials like clean water and electricity, the mixed race-master race wins out.

One benefit of low genetic diversity is, much like Scandanavia or Japan, those areas are usually hard to reach. Thus, they have very few wars take place on thier lands, which allows them to progress much faster than areas where infastructure is constantly getting destroyed. This is how Britain overtook France, and how the US overtook Britain. And if you compare the entropy in the US compared with the police state of China, you can see this play out again.

This has little to do with the benefit of genetic diversity.
 
Different culture, hard to judge.
Different cultures, hard to judge
87775575-petri-dish-with-colonies-of-bacteria-and-fungi.jpg
 
Different cultures, hard to judge
87775575-petri-dish-with-colonies-of-bacteria-and-fungi.jpg
I would say three of them are successfully growing a human anus from stem cells, two are the result of scientists being really excited about growing human anus, and one is a failed attempt at growing a human anus.

Easier to judge than those poor hill folk imo
 
I would say three of them are successfully growing a human anus from stem cells, two are the result of scientists being really excited about growing human anus, and one is a failed attempt at growing a human anus.

Easier to judge than those poor hill folk imo
jjlaughing.gif

You've achieved the hard!
 
The healthiest and most asthetically beautiful populations are those of mass miscegenation. Hispanic, Berber, Desi, Slavic.

Parts of the world where different ethnicities constantly took control of.

Did you just mention slavic and healthy in one sentence.
 
See, if you live in the moment, like a dog, nothing troubles you for too long.
 
Genetically, yes. Alcohol and potato addiction aside. Slavics dominate strength and power sports.

I would not use strongman as good example of healthy genetics.

When its 1-5 guys from country x when population of said country is millions
 
Let’s just hope they all donate to the local spent bank.
 
I would not use strongman as good example of healthy genetics.

When its 1-5 guys from country x when population of said country is millions

Powerlifting, olympic weightlifting, boxing? wrestling, judo, hammer throw, discus, shot put, so on. Plus power sports like Hockey and Rugby. Russia physically dominated many teams at their first ever World Cup in Tokyo, despite having very little rugby pedigree and those teams have much more experience. They ended up losing on skill and tactics, not on athleticism. Russia were a dominant force in Hockey from the start of the game going international.
 
Powerlifting, olympic weightlifting, boxing? wrestling, judo, hammer throw, discus, shot put, so on. Plus power sports like Hockey and Rugby. Russia physically dominated many teams at their first ever World Cup in Tokyo, despite having very little rugby pedigree and those teams have much more experience. They ended up losing on skill and tactics, not on athleticism. Russia were a dominant force in Hockey from the start of the game going international.

Boxing is ran by central asians

Wrestling is ran by guys from caucasus not slavs

Rest i will give to you lol

I will clear up a bit since i can speak a bit atleast for ex soviet countries

I will say what i said in stand up forum

In ex soviet countries (just using as an example) sports are supported a whole lot more than in west.

So using ammy boxer as an example

If you are a succesful ammy boxer in russia goverment will pay you to train hence training will become your "job"

After or during career you can apply to sports university to become a coach or get some cushy office job.So its an actual legitimare career path

Last year price for winning russian amateur boxing championship was a car and 120 000 dollars which is huge money in russia, about 33 years worth of salary

Its same with weightlifting, running,track and field etc.There are schools that sole purpose is to make olympic contenders

Can you imagine school for 5 years olds thats called "olympic contender school" in west?

So in my opinion its not genetics but support and resources put in by goverment.

This from a guy whose grandad was in soviet olympic team and mom played in soviet national volleyball league
 
Boxing is ran by central asians

Wrestling is ran by guys from caucasus not slavs

Rest i will give to you lol

I will clear up a bit since i can speak a bit atleast for ex soviet countries

I will say what i said in stand up forum

In ex soviet countries (just using as an example) sports are supported a whole lot more than in west.

So using ammy boxer as an example

If you are a succesful ammy boxer in russia goverment will pay you to train hence training will become your "job"

After or during career you can apply to sports university to become a coach or get some cushy office job.So its an actual legitimare career path

Last year price for winning russian amateur boxing championship was a car and 120 000 dollars which is huge money in russia, about 33 years worth of salary

Its same with weightlifting, running,track and field etc.There are schools that sole purpose is to make olympic contenders

Can you imagine school for 5 years olds thats called "olympic contender school" in west?

So in my opinion its not genetics but support and resources put in by goverment.

This from a guy whose grandad was in soviet olympic team and mom played in soviet national volleyball league

Many countries do something similar though, maybe not across as many sports, but they target and fund their chosen sports to get results. Britain with rowing, track boxing, and cycling. China with weightlifting and gymnastics. India with wrestling. Iran with wrestling and weightlifting. Jamaica with track. The US with swimming, gymnastics, wrestling, track and rowing. Australia with swimming and rowing. Turkey with wrestling. Somalia and Ethiopia with distance running.
 
Those areas have the highest HDI. Once you standardize for income per capita and access to essentials like clean water and electricity, the mixed race-master race wins out.

One benefit of low genetic diversity is, much like Scandanavia or Japan, those areas are usually hard to reach. Thus, they have very few wars take place on thier lands, which allows them to progress much faster than areas where infastructure is constantly getting destroyed. This is how Britain overtook France, and how the US overtook Britain. And if you compare the entropy in the US compared with the police state of China, you can see this play out again.

This has little to do with the benefit of genetic diversity.

Do those studies actually exist? What are the odds that the societies with the exact opposite of what you say is healthy live the longest?

Genetic diversity is important, but you are making too much out of race. Superficial exterior differences between people isn't a measure of overall genetic differences.
 
I'd be out of that place in a heart beat. Fucking gives me the texas chainsaw massacre vibes.

iu
 
Back
Top