If 9/11 wasn’t an inside job then why did WTC 7 collapse the way it did? It wasn’t even hit by a plane.
There were also people who reported hearing bombs going off in the towers before and after the planes hit. None of the black boxes from the planes were ever recovered even though they are indestructible but somehow they manage to find one of the terrorists passport a few blocks away from the WTC site.
Larry Silverstein took out a billion dollar insurance policy on the towers in case of total destruction 2 months before the attacks. There barely any plane debris around the pentagon site and all of the cameras around the area were turned off on that day. The 9/11 hijackers were also rookie pilots at best and they didn’t have to skills to fly a huge commercial plane and there were also numerous military drills involving fake hijackings of commercial airplanes on the day of 9/11.
Documents from the 60’s showed that the US government had no problem with faking a terrorist attack on American Soil and blaming it on a foreign country so they can wage war. The people who still believe the official story is misinformed because there’s too many evidence suggesting that the government had some type of involvement in the attacks.
Short answers time since these are all highly debunked conspiracy questions.
1. WTC 7 suffered a collapse because that's what happens to steel framed buildings when you allow multiple story fires to rage for hours. And no, it did not collapse in a uniform manner.
2. Larry Silverstein took over part of the lease on the buildings (he wasn't the sole owner). He was contractually obligated to purchase insurance. He didn't take out terrorism insurance. He took out insurance in general because that's what you do when you take ownership of an asset that large. He included terrorism coverage because the building already had it and was a terrorism target. It's not like he already had insurance and decided to go get special terrorist insurance.
3. No cameras were turned off at the site of the Pentagon attack. What are you even suggesting with that statement? That a commercial airliner that left a commercial airport wasn't what crashed into it? Because there was debris, it also knocked over lamp posts in the street and flew over a packed highway of witnesses.
4. The hijackers were more than skilled enough to point a commercial jet at a target and fly into it. The hard part is landing and taking off, not staying in the air and they had to do neither.
5. Several flight recorders were recovered. Black boxes are not indestructible despite your uneducated claim otherwise. Not only was a passport found, but tons of other debris including plane parts in the area around WTC up to a decade later. They found a Boeing marked piece of the plane wedged in an alley in like 2010.
6. The military exercises Global Guardian and Vigilant Guardian were about nuclear command and control testing and Soviet bomber defense. They included one single traditional hijacking scenario. That's kind of the exact point of training though buddy. They train for real world scenarios. What exactly do you think the military does when they aren't at war? They train. It's a constant rotation of training events.
7. People reported hearing some sort of explosions, not bombs. There is no established reports of anything prior to the plane impacts. There's a million things that could have made a noise that could be described as "sounded like a bomb" that don't include a bomb. I could smack a couple of 2x4s together in my garage and someone next door would say "sounds like a gunshot".
You really need to take a strong and serious look at how you gather information and analyze it. You're regurgitating basic conspiracy shit that already has reasonable explanations. You need to learn how to look at both sides of a story before you come to a conclusion. Fact check yourself with reliable independent sources before you say some stupid shit again.
