Important Note : Nate Diaz tapped Prime Conor

I just like what I see. Doesn't make me gay.
So in other words, correct me if I'm wrong. What you are saying is, a man can be sexually attracted to another man's butt and want to stick it and not be gay. Would you care to elaborate and what differentiates that from a person that is gay?
 
So in other words, correct me if I'm wrong. What you are saying is, a man can be sexually attracted to another man's butt and want to stick it and not be gay. Would you care to elaborate and what differentiates that from a person that is gay?
That ass was in my face, just as it was yours. We may have wanted it, but it doesn't mean we would actively pursue it.
 
That ass was in my face, just as it was yours. We may have wanted it, but it doesn't mean we would actively pursue it.
Ok man. I'm not going to insult you or denigrate you. In fact, you've help me to reevaluate my own idea of what "gay" means. The more I think about it, I think the idea of what that word means has seeped over into my own Christian worldview from the secular culture. Implicit in that word is that its what you are,that its a permanent aspect of makes you you. I reject that. I think its a condition that a person can have from extremely early childhood and, thus, lead them to think they were always like that but I do not believe people are born gay. I'm no expert on these things but from what I've observed, it seems there are two ways a man becomes gay (I'm not as cocksure about women). Either something early developmentally happened (it could be abuse or no male figure to provide healthy fatherly affection) that seeded the later development of these aberrant desires or the person is simply so devoid of moral boundaries and social mores, they simply don't have any inhibition about things and are down for whatever; woman, man, goat if the mood's right, what have you. I'm wondering if the latter is what you are since you seem to be confounded that I would put a gay label on you for being attracted to Conor's glute set. Perhaps there is a third thing that can lead to it, and I'm just brainstorming here; simply being deprived from the presence of women for a very long period of time, like in prison. Of course, even then, it needs to be accompanied by the characteristics I listed in the second scenario so the two may be one and the same, I haven't thought that through. Anyway, the bottom line is, it ain't natural. Its abominable in the sight of God to look on a man with lust.
 
Important note: prime full camp Diaz got outboxed and dropped 3 times by lil' Conor

#dealwithit
 
Had Nate never rematched Colin, I KNOW for SURE that this would be under debate. Nate has a tough fight with Michael Johnson, then taps Conor. Had he retired, Sherdog would be cleansed of Conor fans

They are ALL The worst Nuthuggers:

View attachment 160507


"Prime Connor" might be my biggest missed opportunity. That is genius.
 
Ok man. I'm not going to insult you or denigrate you. In fact, you've help me to reevaluate my own idea of what "gay" means. The more I think about it, I think the idea of what that word means has seeped over into my own Christian worldview from the secular culture. Implicit in that word is that its what you are,that its a permanent aspect of makes you you. I reject that. I think its a condition that a person can have from extremely early childhood and, thus, lead them to think they were always like that but I do not believe people are born gay. I'm no expert on these things but from what I've observed, it seems there are two ways a man becomes gay (I'm not as cocksure about women). Either something early developmentally happened (it could be abuse or no male figure to provide healthy fatherly affection) that seeded the later development of these aberrant desires or the person is simply so devoid of moral boundaries and social mores, they simply don't have any inhibition about things and are down for whatever; woman, man, goat if the mood's right, what have you. I'm wondering if the latter is what you are since you seem to be confounded that I would put a gay label on you for being attracted to Conor's glute set. Perhaps there is a third thing that can lead to it, and I'm just brainstorming here; simply being deprived from the presence of women for a very long period of time, like in prison. Of course, even then, it needs to be accompanied by the characteristics I listed in the second scenario so the two may be one and the same, I haven't thought that through. Anyway, the bottom line is, it ain't natural. Its abominable in the sight of God to look on a man with lust.

Someone just blew his wad
@Wadtucket
 
Ok man. I'm not going to insult you or denigrate you. In fact, you've help me to reevaluate my own idea of what "gay" means. The more I think about it, I think the idea of what that word means has seeped over into my own Christian worldview from the secular culture. Implicit in that word is that its what you are,that its a permanent aspect of makes you you. I reject that. I think its a condition that a person can have from extremely early childhood and, thus, lead them to think they were always like that but I do not believe people are born gay. I'm no expert on these things but from what I've observed, it seems there are two ways a man becomes gay (I'm not as cocksure about women). Either something early developmentally happened (it could be abuse or no male figure to provide healthy fatherly affection) that seeded the later development of these aberrant desires or the person is simply so devoid of moral boundaries and social mores, they simply don't have any inhibition about things and are down for whatever; woman, man, goat if the mood's right, what have you. I'm wondering if the latter is what you are since you seem to be confounded that I would put a gay label on you for being attracted to Conor's glute set. Perhaps there is a third thing that can lead to it, and I'm just brainstorming here; simply being deprived from the presence of women for a very long period of time, like in prison. Of course, even then, it needs to be accompanied by the characteristics I listed in the second scenario so the two may be one and the same, I haven't thought that through. Anyway, the bottom line is, it ain't natural. Its abominable in the sight of God to look on a man with lust.
{<doc}
 
Back
Top