- Joined
- Aug 1, 2013
- Messages
- 7,810
- Reaction score
- 0
Bisping guaranteed a win. He won't let us down and will retire that TRT dinosaur.
It's a BS match and I will not buy this PPV no matter who else is on it. I have no problem with fights made for interest but not when the title is is held up for it. There are 4 deserving fighters, I favor Jacare but wouldn't bitch about Chris, Luke, or Romero. Henderson isn't top 10 anymore.
He doesn't have to be. Being the "best" is just some subjective bullshit anyway.
He beat the guy that had the belt. That's all that matters.
Fights that Bisping will lose.
Fights kinda like that. Only against fighters that are smart enough to take him seriously. Like any other top MW--and even Rockhold now that (presumably) he's learned his lesson.You mean, like the 2nd Rockhold fight? Fights like that?
Fights kinda like that. Only against fighters that are smart enough to take him seriously. Like any other top MW--and even Rockhold now that (presumably) he's learned his lesson.
Not even you think that he would beat Rockhold again.
It doesn't matter what I think.
A fight is a fight and anything can happen. Regardless of how you try to rationalize who the "best" is.
It is ridiculous to pretend that you don't know what the "best" means.
You do. And you know it's not Bisping.
You may not know exactly who it is, but you definitely know who it isn't.
I don't think of it like that. I'm not trying to bestow some wacky subjective ranking on a dude for no reason.
If the "best" = the champion, then Bisping is currently the "best". If the "best" is defined some other way, then tell us what that is and who it is.
Where are you even coming from with this stuff?
Haven't you ever predicted who would win in a matchup? Sure, we've all been wrong: Serra/GSP, Bisping/Rockhold, etc. but being wrong occasionally doesn't make predictions impossible, and predictions don't require "wacky subjective rankings."
I predict that Bisping will lose to Hendo. I predict that he'd lose to Rockhold in a rematch. I predict that he'd lose to Jacare. I predict that he'd lose to Weidman. I predict that he'd lose to Romero. And I predict that he'd lose to Kennedy again. If I believe that he would lose to that many MWs, I can't believe that he's the best.
It's super simple, and I don't have any wacky subjective ranking. See?
That's you. You were trying to project this thought process on to me and I don't think that way. See?
Why did you even bother to respond to me in the first place?
Oh, I see, you're an idiot....Because I can