- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
- Messages
- 21,164
- Reaction score
- 4,677
Say a round is really close, like 10-10 close or you're just flipping a coin to decide who gets the 10 and who gets the 9. In those cases, the smaller fighter should get a point on the round. If it was going to be 10-10, the smaller fighter should win the round 10-9. If the judges were 50-50 on who gets the 10 and who gets the 9, the smaller fighter should get the 10 and the larger fighter should get the 9.
It will fight against stalling strategies like lay and pray that go against the spirit of the martial arts. Larger men often just use their size to lay on a smaller man and do nothing to "win" the round. That won't happen anymore.
This will help to stop unfair weight cutting. It will also make the size disadvantage more fair.
What do you think? What are other ways to stop unfair weight cutting? What are other ways to make size disadvantages more fair? What are other ways to keep the competition of MMA closer to the spirit of the martial arts?
It will fight against stalling strategies like lay and pray that go against the spirit of the martial arts. Larger men often just use their size to lay on a smaller man and do nothing to "win" the round. That won't happen anymore.
This will help to stop unfair weight cutting. It will also make the size disadvantage more fair.
What do you think? What are other ways to stop unfair weight cutting? What are other ways to make size disadvantages more fair? What are other ways to keep the competition of MMA closer to the spirit of the martial arts?