• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

News 'Iceman' Chuck Liddell off the Hook

I just asked you to apologize and admit you were wrong. Your refusal to do so only shows how immature and deluded you are. I proved you wrong several times, and now the full story has unfolded just like I predicted it would. I didn't know you two were going back and forth, and I don't care to reiterate all the same shit I said before. It's already been proven to be correct, and you want to just stick your fingers in your ears and say "lalalala". That's little kid shit. Carry on, Pony Boy.
Show me where I was wrong and I will freely admit it. My life doesn't revolve around "being right on sherdog" like some people.
 
Show me where I was wrong and I will freely admit it. My life doesn't revolve around "being right on sherdog" like some people.

Go back and review if you're not man enough to admit it. You were wrong then, and you're wrong now. A few of us were telling you repeatedly, as were are now.
 
Go back and review if you're not man enough to admit it. You were wrong then, and you're wrong now. A few of us were telling you repeatedly, as were are now.
That's on you bud. Pretty easy to pull up my post where "I was wrong" but somehow you can't do it.
 
That's on you bud. Pretty easy to pull up my post where "I was wrong" but somehow you can't do it.

Just review (if you must), admit, apologize, and move on. Almost every post you made in the other Chuck thread was wrong. I say "almost" generously. Grow up, man. You're just being a stubborn child and trying to last word someone. You said a lot of shit that was wrong, and you were pretending to know more about the situation and the justice system than anybody who tried to educate you. You were wrong - that's all.
 
Just review (if you must), admit, apologize, and move on. Almost every post you made in the other Chuck thread was wrong. I say "almost" generously. Grow up, man. You're just being a stubborn child and trying to last word someone. You said a lot of shit that was wrong, and you were pretending to know more about the situation and the justice system than anybody who tried to educate you. You were wrong - that's all.
But you can't think of even one little thing? ok lol. Good thing you're not really a lawyer and just play one on sherdog
 
But you can't think of even one little thing? ok lol. Good thing you're not really a lawyer and just play one on sherdog

As I said, almost, if not, everything you said. Especially about mandatory arrests and charges. I've spent enough time proving you wrong, I'm not going to cross-thread multi-quote you just so you can continue to play internet pretend time PeeWee Patty cake. Man up, boy, or carry on. It just speaks of your character.
 
So a little bit of shoving from both sides and then she probably lashed out. Chuck isnt going to be pressing charges for a scratch to his face.
 
Nice to hear he is not being charged. What is not very nice is the fact there was very little news about this. He was all over the news when first arrested but i see hardly anything about him NOT being charged. I am an mma fan so I will have eventually stumbled upon this news.
They do it all the time--rumors on the front page and retraction/update on page 11. I feel like this happens all the time
 
Nice to hear he is not being charged. What is not very nice is the fact there was very little news about this. He was all over the news when first arrested but i see hardly anything about him NOT being charged. I am an mma fan so I will have eventually stumbled upon this news.
They do it all the time--rumors on the front page and retraction/update on page 11. I feel like this happens all the time

It does. They want people to tune in, read the article, click their link, watch their video, and whatever else people can do so they get plays or views. That's literally all they care about. Is normal.
 
Just review (if you must), admit, apologize, and move on. Almost every post you made in the other Chuck thread was wrong. I say "almost" generously. Grow up, man. You're just being a stubborn child and trying to last word someone. You said a lot of shit that was wrong, and you were pretending to know more about the situation and the justice system than anybody who tried to educate you. You were wrong - that's all.
Nope. It's way more nuanced than you want to paint it. What didn't add up was that he said he wanted to protect the privacy of his family but then blurted out the private information that his wife was a mental case. A lot of information was missing at first, but when it trickled in, it became clear to me that this was the situation:

1. The Lidells were out to a party and returned home early in the morning.
2. An argument ensued which turned physical to some degree.
3. The cops were called.
4. When the cops arrived, they found no physical evidence of a struggle but one or both said there had been a physical altercation.
5. With no physical evidence, they must have blamed each other because the police could not identify the attacker/who started it.
6. They told the Lidells that because they had admitted to a physical incident, they had to take one of them in.
7. At this point Chuck, thinking of the kid/kids, says he will be the one to spare them the trauma of seeing their mother led away in cuffs. (I completely agree with this)
8. He spends the night in jail and the media blows up about it.
9. On his release, he is still hopping mad at his wife and unloads on her on his social media, saying she is completely to blame and has ongoing mental problems. (Which is probably true imo--but not that he doesn't)

And that's the last time I checked in on the story. If you want to dig into my posts and present some contrary evidence (which you should if you are going to wildly accuse people of shit that you "don't remember but...", feel free.

There's my final writing on the subject. So what am I wrong about? Take your time.
 
There's my final writing on the subject. So what am I wrong about? Take your time.

Yeah...that was after days of you posting nonsense, refusing to listen to people, insisting you were right, and ended up with you trying to save face with one final fiction mini-novel after you had already been proven wrong countless times. Is normal.

Just fuckin man up, apologize, and admit you were wrong. It's literally that simple. You're unfamiliar with these situations, and you jumped to conclusions. You chose to believe whatever you convinced yourself to be true, rather than take the word of others who were more informed. Man up, buttercup. It'll say a lot about your character if you do.
 
Liddell ended up with a red mark on his face, while his wife had no visible injuries.

Iceman can't even win a fight against his wife these days ffs
 
Yeah...that was after days of you posting nonsense, refusing to listen to people, insisting you were right, and ended up with you trying to save face with one final fiction mini-novel after you had already been proven wrong countless times. Is normal.

Just fuckin man up, apologize, and admit you were wrong. It's literally that simple. You're unfamiliar with these situations, and you jumped to conclusions. You chose to believe whatever you convinced yourself to be true, rather than take the word of others who were more informed. Man up, buttercup. It'll say a lot about your character if you do.
Ah. So "almost everything" I ever said on the subject is wrong but there's nothing wrong with the "mini - novel" I wrote on the subject. Gotcha. You must be kflo's bot account. You respond immediately with the same three responses: "You're wrong, I'm right, because I know everything". But when asked real question that requires real thought, you just default back to your list and start over. In that respect, your posts are completely worthless.
 
Just because the charges were dropped doesn't change the fact that he got arrested for getting physical with his wife.

If jones isn't off the hook then neither should Chuck be.

<JRSmith40>
 
Ah. So "almost everything" I ever said on the subject is wrong but there's nothing wrong with the "mini - novel" I wrote on the subject. Gotcha. You must be kflo's bot account. You respond immediately with the same three responses: "You're wrong, I'm right, because I know everything". But when asked real question that requires real thought, you just default back to your list and start over. In that respect, your posts are completely worthless.

Start with your first 10 posts in the thread that I responded to. Try harder.
 
They were prolly both amped up, gettin buck wild.

giphy.gif


Coke Liddell FTW

Cheddar Bob
 
Back
Top