I am not impressed by DC at all

JustOnce

On Hiatus
@Gold
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
24,000
Reaction score
28,129
My reasoning are follows.

The order of events accomplished does not have an impact on the value of the whole events. For example, over the course of the fight, whether the near guilotine attempt happened in round 2 and near ko in round 3, or other way around, doesnt change the whole picture of the performance.

Daniel Cormier ia a heavyweight who came back up. Just because someones shorter and looks chunky it doesnt mean he is not a small guy. He competed in wrestling at 211 pounds, and he even had kidney failute trying to cut weight in olympic.S It wasnt a sure thing if he could cut to LHW when a word came out he would try. He weighed in heavier against Stipe who doesnt cut weight either.

Imagine for a second order of events has changed. That Daniel Cormier defeated Stipe for Hw crown then moved down and got betaed by Jon Jones twice then Jon Jones tested positive.

Is that impressive?

I am a big fan of underdogs but usually underdogs lose. Daniel Cormier wasnt one either. No one in their right mind would have thought DC would lose to Stipe if DC never went down either.

Personally, out of the history of two weight claass champion, in my humble opinion, who actually overcame or tried to overcome weight disadvantage, was BJ Penn and only him. Thats the only one in my opinion who truly tried to beat the better, stronger champion and succeeded once.
 
grumpy.jpg
 
Stipe hands are overrated, yeah he has power but he doesnt know how to throw a fcking uppercut vs a shorter guy like cormier
 
My reasoning are follows.

The order of events accomplished does not have an impact on the value of the whole events. For example, over the course of the fight, whether the near guilotine attempt happened in round 2 and near ko in round 3, or other way around, doesnt change the whole picture of the performance.

Daniel Cormier ia a heavyweight who came back up. Just because someones shorter and looks chunky it doesnt mean he is not a small guy. He competed in wrestling at 211 pounds, and he even had kidney failute trying to cut weight in olympic.S It wasnt a sure thing if he could cut to LHW when a word came out he would try. He weighed in heavier against Stipe who doesnt cut weight either.

Imagine for a second order of events has changed. That Daniel Cormier defeated Stipe for Hw crown then moved down and got betaed by Jon Jones twice then Jon Jones tested positive.

Is that impressive?

I am a big fan of underdogs but usually underdogs lose. Daniel Cormier wasnt one either. No one in their right mind would have thought DC would lose to Stipe if DC never went down either.

Personally, out of the history of two weight claass champion, in my humble opinion, who actually overcame or tried to overcome weight disadvantage, was BJ Penn and only him. Thats the only one in my opinion who truly tried to beat the better, stronger champion and succeeded once.
<{gspressed}>
 
You just really don’t like dc for whatever reason. And he was a heavy underdog Vegas.
 
Whether he is a true HW or LHW, winning a belt in two divisions is still impressive.

Jones is a great fighter, the best, and losing to him is nothing to hang your head about. We all already knew this.
 
One of the stupidest posts you'll ever read, can we demote this fucker back to white belt please.
 
My reasoning are follows.

The order of events accomplished does not have an impact on the value of the whole events. For example, over the course of the fight, whether the near guilotine attempt happened in round 2 and near ko in round 3, or other way around, doesnt change the whole picture of the performance.

Daniel Cormier ia a heavyweight who came back up. Just because someones shorter and looks chunky it doesnt mean he is not a small guy. He competed in wrestling at 211 pounds, and he even had kidney failute trying to cut weight in olympic.S It wasnt a sure thing if he could cut to LHW when a word came out he would try. He weighed in heavier against Stipe who doesnt cut weight either.

Imagine for a second order of events has changed. That Daniel Cormier defeated Stipe for Hw crown then moved down and got betaed by Jon Jones twice then Jon Jones tested positive.

Is that impressive?

I am a big fan of underdogs but usually underdogs lose. Daniel Cormier wasnt one either. No one in their right mind would have thought DC would lose to Stipe if DC never went down either.

Personally, out of the history of two weight claass champion, in my humble opinion, who actually overcame or tried to overcome weight disadvantage, was BJ Penn and only him. Thats the only one in my opinion who truly tried to beat the better, stronger champion and succeeded once.

You are dumb then.

{<jordan}
 
My reasoning are follows.

The order of events accomplished does not have an impact on the value of the whole events. For example, over the course of the fight, whether the near guilotine attempt happened in round 2 and near ko in round 3, or other way around, doesnt change the whole picture of the performance.

Daniel Cormier ia a heavyweight who came back up. Just because someones shorter and looks chunky it doesnt mean he is not a small guy. He competed in wrestling at 211 pounds, and he even had kidney failute trying to cut weight in olympic.S It wasnt a sure thing if he could cut to LHW when a word came out he would try. He weighed in heavier against Stipe who doesnt cut weight either.

Imagine for a second order of events has changed. That Daniel Cormier defeated Stipe for Hw crown then moved down and got betaed by Jon Jones twice then Jon Jones tested positive.

Is that impressive?

I am a big fan of underdogs but usually underdogs lose. Daniel Cormier wasnt one either. No one in their right mind would have thought DC would lose to Stipe if DC never went down either.

Personally, out of the history of two weight claass champion, in my humble opinion, who actually overcame or tried to overcome weight disadvantage, was BJ Penn and only him. Thats the only one in my opinion who truly tried to beat the better, stronger champion and succeeded once.
DC is holding the heavyweight and light heavyweight belt right now. You know anyone else that has done that?
 
Yeah why is it stupid? Cuz u dont like it?
Because weight and all the crap you're talking aside, he still beat a reigning heavyweight champ, and the only time he's ever been beaten in the sport was against a career cheat, if DC doesn't impress you then who does? One fighter ever in Jones?
 
Because weight and all the crap you're talking aside, he still beat a reigning heavyweight champ, and the only time he's ever been beaten in the sport was against a career cheat, if DC doesn't impress you then who does? One fighter ever in Jones?

Jones is definitely more impressive. He is for most people i think.
 
Did you suffer a stroke before you posted this TS?
 
Back
Top