Social Humans are fighting and doing harm although they are miniature

Your Account

reacted to your score
@Silver
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
12,080
Reaction score
5,803
How stupid is that , and weird ?
Can you imagine that these beings are so small in their environment, but at the same time putting their efforts to take over some land from someone, fight, and do harm to others including themselves ?

Chatgpt for some reason id itself with humans
and use we and our to explain this embarrassing phenomena:

..the size of a human being is indeed minuscule compared to the vastness of the observable universe.
..human being's size is an extremely tiny fraction of a percentage, about 0.0000000000000177% of the diameter of the observable universe..
..It's essential to understand that we are incredibly tiny in comparison to the vastness of the cosmos. Our existence is just a minuscule part of the grand cosmic scale..

 
Ants have wars too, and still have sense

Animals that have group behaviour are likely to get involved in group vs group violence
 
0.0000000000000177%
Probably more like 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000177%.
 
How stupid is that , and weird ?
Can you imagine that these beings are so small in their environment, but at the same time putting their efforts to take over some land from someone, fight, and do harm to others including themselves ?

Chatgpt for some reason id itself with humans
and use we and our to explain this embarrassing phenomena:

..the size of a human being is indeed minuscule compared to the vastness of the observable universe.
..human being's size is an extremely tiny fraction of a percentage, about 0.0000000000000177% of the diameter of the observable universe..
..It's essential to understand that we are incredibly tiny in comparison to the vastness of the cosmos. Our existence is just a minuscule part of the grand cosmic scale..
Don't be a size queen. Small guys like Henry Cejudo has as much right to fighting as giant guys like Bob Sapp
 
The microscopic biome in the soil is perpetually at war.
 
It's just in our nature(along with almost every species of animal).To compete is consistent with the nature of life. Unfortunately, altruism does not positively correlate with an organism being able to pass on its genes. At least, through most of history.
 
With the words of Leonard Cohen:
We are so small between the stars, so large against the sky.
 
How stupid is that , and weird ?
Can you imagine that these beings are so small in their environment, but at the same time putting their efforts to take over some land from someone, fight, and do harm to others including themselves ?

Chatgpt for some reason id itself with humans
and use we and our to explain this embarrassing phenomena:

..the size of a human being is indeed minuscule compared to the vastness of the observable universe.
..human being's size is an extremely tiny fraction of a percentage, about 0.0000000000000177% of the diameter of the observable universe..
..It's essential to understand that we are incredibly tiny in comparison to the vastness of the cosmos. Our existence is just a minuscule part of the grand cosmic scale..

Ants have wars too, and still have sense

Animals that have group behaviour are likely to get involved in group vs group violence

 
You sure about that? I think it's a fair bit smaller than that but I can't be arsed to check exact numbers right now.

Probably more like 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000177%.

I just looked it up. At least in terms of the height of a human, it might be off by a fair amount, but not by that much.

According to wikipedia the diameter of the observable universe is: 8.8×10^26 m
So if the average person is 1.70m, the fraction is: 1.7 / 8.8×10^26 m = 1.9318181818×10^(−27)

And if you multiply by 100 to get it in terms of percentage, you get:

1.9318181818×10^(−25) = 0.000000000000000000000000193%

Maybe if you used some other way to measure a human or some other published size of the universe, ChatGPT might be right too.
 
Last edited:
I just looked it up. At least in terms of the height of a human, it might be off by a fair amount, but not by that much.

According to wikipedia the diameter of the observable universe is: 8.8×10^26 m
So if the average person is 1.70m, the fraction is: 1.7 / 8.8×10^26 m = 1.9318181818×10^(−27)

And if you multiply by 100 to get it in terms of percentage, you get:

1.9318181818×10^(−25) = 0.000000000000000000000000193%

Maybe if you used some other way to measure a human or some other published size of the universe, ChatGPT might be right too.

Thanks, that sounds more reasonable. I assume that other guy was being sarcastic but yeah a factor of ~10^11 is pretty significant.
 
Back
Top