• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

How to Steal an Airplane

Can't watch the video unfortunately as I am at work so forgive me for commenting anyway.

From perspective, if someone was going to cyberjack a plane wouldn't logic tell you that they would crash it into a specific target and not into an area in which it would vanish without a trace?

Whilst I don't doubt in this day and age it can be done, I don't see it being a plausible explanation for this missing jet. Terrorists want to bring attention to their cause, no one has claimed responsibility and no one knows where the wreckage is so extremely doubtful it was terrorist cyber jacker in this instance imo.
 
Can't watch the video unfortunately as I am at work so forgive me for commenting anyway.

From perspective, if someone was going to cyberjack a plane wouldn't logic tell you that they would crash it into a specific target and not into an area in which it would vanish without a trace?

Whilst I don't doubt in this day and age it can be done, I don't see it being a plausible explanation for this missing jet. Terrorists want to bring attention to their cause, no one has claimed responsibility and no one knows where the wreckage is so extremely doubtful it was terrorist cyber jacker in this instance imo.

"Please don't comment if you're not going to watch this short video." There was a reason I said this. You'll miss the point if you don't watch.

It's not really about MH370. It's just that the bizarre circumstances surrounding this event have compelled the media to entertain a possibility that was considered absurd on 9/11, and that's really it's only relevance here. The technology exists, and was likely necessary for the complicated maneuvers used by the aircraft on 9/11. I'll let you watch at home and then comment.
 
Congrats. You just got red-flagged by an NSA algorithm for this thread title.
 
I have seen The Eyeopener videos before and its CT heaven.
 
What about the phone calls that 9/11 passengers made to loved ones before they died?
Were their phones cyber jacked too?

Those planes were only flying 1000 ft above the ground. You need connection to a satellite to be able to make calls at a normal flying altitude.
 
The "corporate news networks" aren't "desperate" to fill the 24/7 news cycle...ever. That just isn't a problem. They just choose to fill it will softer news because, well, people are so interested in this that in spite of that fact that almost every tidbit discussed is speculative, we're talking about it.

We're starting threads about it. That's why they're covering it, and that is the only reason, not desperation or a lack of other content.
 
The "corporate news networks" aren't "desperate" to fill the 24/7 news cycle...ever. That just isn't a problem. They just choose to fill it will softer news because, well, people are so interested in this that in spite of that fact that almost every tidbit discussed is speculative, we're talking about it.

We're starting threads about it. That's why they're covering it, and that is the only reason, not desperation or a lack of other content.

You telling me that people wouldn't want to know about the radiation from Fukushima being dumped into the Pacific? Or how Western NGOs had a hand in fomenting revolution in the Ukraine for a decade prior to this "revolution"? Or a million other way more important issues than this plane?

Well, I guess I don't disagree with what you're saying since; yes, I agree there is not a lack of news, they just choose to feed us this 'infotainment' crap to keep us (well, people who watch CNN anyway) feeling informed, but in reality dumbed down.

BTW my thread is about 9/11, MH370 was just the bait. Watch the video, friendo.
 
Congrats. You just got red-flagged by an NSA algorithm for this thread title.

Too late for that brother. lol

I seriously think the NSA knows me by now. I live in Canada, but my country's spy agency is just as bad, and not as well known. They also interface with eachother, says Snowden anyway.
 
In their desperation, they have even turned to speculation on a subject long shunned as outlandish conspiracy theory by these very same networks:

But what you posted is just Corbett talking about it. He's an InfoWars regular, not a regular on CNN. He's a truther, climate change denier yada yada yada. So how is this any different for him?
 
You telling me that people wouldn't want to know about the radiation from Fukushima being dumped into the Pacific? Or how Western NGOs had a hand in fomenting revolution in the Ukraine for a decade prior to this "revolution"? Or a million other way more important issues than this plane?
Yes, that is exactly what I'm telling you. From the nature of your tone I gather that I'm preaching to the choir. Suddenly this thread is awkward.
 
Back
Top