... not actual competitive grappling bouts, but
fixed exhibitions?
A little background:
This isn't a Fedor hate thread, he is still my HW GOAT and I've been blessed with the chance to watch him fight in his prime.
But a few months ago, someone IRL told me that one of his biggest "underrated" achievements were his back-to-back quick submissions of Shinya Aoki & Gegard Mousasi, at
M-1 events
(we were watching a UFC event with a bunch of friends, so there were people I had never met)
So, as a huge Fedor fanboy myself, I told him "yeah, those were fun to watch, but they were faked exhibitions", back then they barely made an effort to pretend that it was going to be a real contest; they were right after Fedor KO'd top 3 HW Andrei Arlovski, and was on top of the world, and M-1 bringing him at events with few interesting fights was a good way to bring in Fedor fans wanting to see him compete in whatever, even if it was basically a pro-wrestling bout...
I mean, the second one with Mousasi was headlined by
King Mo (-1100 favorite) vs a super washed up version of
Mark Kerr (+600 underdog), who would never fight again afterward.
There was no suspense for that one...
The Fedor vs Mousasi exhibition was the real main event, even if it was a pro-wrestling bout where both guys displayed high level Judo/Sambo techniques...
Thing is, people who were following the sport back then know that those fights weren't hyped like they were for real, but this guy challenged it by saying that Tapology has them listed as "exhibition MMA"
So what do you do when someone tells you?
"Oh yeah? PROVE IT, you mindless hater, Fedor is the best deal with it n00b, plus worked fights "
Fedor is the best HW IMHO, but those 2 exhibitions were clearly presented as risk-free entertainment, even back when it happened. You couldn't even bet on dem.
Problem is: how do I prove it to guys who discovered MMA in the last 2 or 3 years (not that there is anything wrong with that, we were all n00bz at one point) and are used to hard proof when discussing serious business like worked fights.
So... is there a quick way to prove it, in an era where proving something is becoming more and more challenging, because you need both guys on video saying it or "lol you call that a proof?"