Yeah some ok points but overall meh.
On income inequality where we say we should focus on the 20% not the 1%.
Now imagine what that blue line would look at if we removed say the top 5% or even 1%. It’s telling that this piece was happy to say where the hoarder upper middle class starts but not where it ends.The reality is the higher you go up the chain the larger portion of gains in income, so his point that we should be looking lower down the line is nonsensical.
Also how many of his points even applied to this poorly defined class? College Ivey league admissions, internships, etc? He certainly had no data to say internships were under some cartel of the top 20%. Same goes for his zoning BS to keep people out.
The idea that someone in the top 20 has to fall down and make room for someone to climb up is asinine. You want your spot come get it. No parent should think this way. I do agree that society as a whole needs to give everyone an opportunity.
That’s brings me to the only point I really liked, which was was on public schooling. The funding of schools off of local property taxes with no uniform fiscal rebalancing system is a travesty in the states and it accrues mostly to middle and upper middle class families (to extent not sending kids to private schools).