- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 25,290
- Reaction score
- 30,059
It depends what you consider a superfight.
I always consider a champion going up or down a weight division to be considered a "superfight", even if a lot of them are unwarranted/not that intriguing.
Some would say big money fights like Diaz/McGregor, Nunes/Rousey, Brock/Carwin, etc. I can agree to some extent, depending on the hype level.
I would say right there's Izzy/Usman, Volk/Yan, Oliveira/Volk, Izzy/Jiri, and I'll throw in a "money fight" that I could think of which is Diaz/Poirier.
I do thinks some of these are unwarranted or would be a pretty one-sided affair.
Funny thing about Nate is, without Conor he really wouldn't be 1/10th what he is today in terms of fan interest.
At least Khabib had his undefeated record and how good he was and all, but I'm sure he wouldn't be as big without Conor still but on the other hand, Nate has NEVER been elite, but has been very inactive, but I'm sure lots of people would wanna watch Poirier/Nate. Not my type of super fight.
Funny enough though, and Poirier prrobably think that's an easy money fight, but I bet Nate has an exact style to give Poirier trouble if he can defend low kicks and avoid getting cut. Significantly better boxing, BJJ and cardio.