How many pre 2000(year) fighters would be relevant today

bjpenngoat

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,793
Reaction score
2,689
Frank
Ken
bas
guy metzger
severn
royce
Kerr


would any of them be truly relevant in 2016.

Frank was awesome and really well rounded. I dont know if he would have been championship material the guys are so fucking big today, but he was an absolute speciman
 
Short answer: No
Long Answer: Nope
 
well if i had to bet on two from that list it would be kerr and frank. Old man mark coleman was able to get a win over Stephan Bonner...
 
Kerr was huge for the time but I dont think he is any bigger than jared rosholt. Times have changed.
 
gsp fedor bas rutten frank shamrock bj penn anderson silva chuck liddel if they were here today theyd prolly be even better if not just as good. and in the top 10 forsure in there divisions
 
gsp fedor bj anderson and chuck are not pre 2000 fighters. the extent of their careers did not take place before 2000.
 
couture
vitor
hendo
Basically the ines that could..are
 
Kerr was a monster. Period. He would be awesome today with some training.

Also give Frank a shot today if he had a training like the pros.
 
Wanderlei, Igor, Rizzo, Randleman, Coleman, Saku
 
Wanderlei, Igor, Rizzo, Randleman, Coleman, Saku
 
guys stop listing guys like hendo and wanderlie. the extent of their careers was post 2000. same with vitor.
 
Frank was awesome and really well rounded. I dont know if he would have been championship material the guys are so fucking big today, but he was an absolute speciman

He used to just walk in the cage at 195, no weight cut, no diet.
Later, with knee problems, he fought at MW and was still undersized.
With dieting and cutting, I think Frank could fight at 170.
He was a great athlete; explosive and excellent cardio. Great submission wrestler.
And he did beat Tito by just wearing him down.
He'd be a Top 5 WW easily.
 
Pedro Rizzo.

He'd chop up Jon's twig legs real good.
 
Back
Top