I've been trying to find this answer on google but couldn't find anything, I'm guessing it didn't do anywhere near as well as predicted for obvious reasons, is it still a bit early for a definitive number?
Well maybe definitive-ishhhYou will never get a definitive number.
about tree fiddy.I've been trying to find this answer on google but couldn't find anything, I'm guessing it didn't do anywhere near as well as predicted for obvious reasons, is it still a bit early for a definitive number?
I've been trying to find this answer on google but couldn't find anything, I'm guessing it didn't do anywhere near as well as predicted for obvious reasons, is it still a bit early for a definitive number?
Try swapping with 201, See how well he can do. #202 doing well isn't just because of Conor. Have you seen the lineups?I'll lay this guarantee on you. Despite all the great fights at ufc 200, conor vs nate at ufc 202, will easily do higher numbers than 200. Conor already holds the ppv record beating ufc 100. That's a fact. and the rematch against nate is going to beat that record....
I'll lay this guarantee on you. Despite all the great fights at ufc 200, conor vs nate at ufc 202, will easily do higher numbers than 200. Conor already holds the ppv record beating ufc 100. That's a fact. and the rematch against nate is going to beat that record....
Get LEARNT soni dont understand this obsession with ppv sales
as soon as i figure out your post ill go right ahead.....dadGet LEARNT son
I'll lay this guarantee on you. Despite all the great fights at ufc 200, conor vs nate at ufc 202, will easily do higher numbers than 200. Conor already holds the ppv record beating ufc 100. That's a fact. and the rematch against nate is going to beat that record....
I've been trying to find this answer on google but couldn't find anything, I'm guessing it didn't do anywhere near as well as predicted for obvious reasons, is it still a bit early for a definitive number?