- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 10,949
- Reaction score
- 1,331
This is the fifth time I've asked you for something concrete. You have yet to provide anything. Instead, you are doubling down on tone.I read the article and I picked up the tone of it also.
You may not want to admit it but it but it is there.
As far as tone goes, here's how the article ends:
He added: "So here's a prediction: 2018 will not [be] so pleasant for the Kim family regime.
Funny, that tone doesn't seem terribly celebratory or pro Kim.
And, of course, lest anyone think that's an isolated section, it's rife with critiques of Kim . . .
Some commentators point out that Kim's short-term successes must be seen in context. Ultimately, he is the ruler of an impoverished, isolated and deeply repressive nation.
An international committee found in December that Kim and members of his regime were guilty of 10 separate war crimes, relating to North Korea's network of gulags where thousands of people are arbitrarily tortured, raped and executed each year.
"In the larger game, the real one which counts, Trump wins just by being the leader of a wealthy, stable, normal democracy," said Robert Kelly, an associate professor at South Korea's Pusan National University.
"North Korea can survive, it can hang on, and the Kims will murder anyone they must in order to do so," Kelly added. "But North Korea is no model for anyone. It enunciates no vision of the future, nor any happiness for its people. If it is still around in 20 years, it will still be the grim, unhappy barracks state it is now. That's hardly winning."
Right now you're batting 0/5. Are you going to swing again and make it 0/6, or maybe save the shreds of your integrity and admit that your initial post was entirely partisan, and you hadn't yet read the article?