Ok point taken with the armbar but there are other legal submissions like kneebars where you don't get that pain feedback until damage is done. So a fighter that didn't know what a kneebar is could get damaged quickly without a chance to tap, despite it being defendable.
Jones doesn't use the oblique right on the knee, he puts it in the thigh too unless it's coming from an angle. Savate has the same variations from the side.
When I say defend against the oblique I don't mean checking it, I mean lots of movement through range and lateral so it misses and it is nullified or the fighter is open to counter.
The past 5 years or so of Jones and others using it have shown that it wasn't a game changer- just another technique that everyone had to adapt to.
The target is the knee, Jon Jones himself says he calls the technique "push kick to the knees"
Yeah the kneebar is another one that frequently gets brought up in these discussions, I think its more valid than the armbar comparison. As you mentioned if the guy doesnt know what one is, theres a chance for injury before he gets to tap.
My thoughts on the kneebar argument is that, although the time is minimal to tap, it is there, where as with a strike, its non existent. another thing to take into consideration is how difficult/easy kneebar defense and counters are, I dont know BJJ so I have no idea, but the oblique kicks counters/defenses are difficult IMO and the time frame you have to pull it off, is minimal to non existent.
Regarding the counters/blocks to them, I am aware of most of them as we had a hefty debate about this topic a while back, and its been discussed here several times already.
Through my eyes and IMO, the counters/techniques displayed in our previous discussions, did not look intentional, more like a missed shot or slightly misplaced while the other fighter just happened to be moving/bouncing with the rhythm of the fight and the oblique kick misses or slides off. That is how I viewed the videos, I didnt see intentional counters being performed.
Also things that look good or work on paper or theory, dont always work in a fight. Its kind of hard to explain but theres just certain things you can do in training and even sparring or play sparring that arent happening in a fight, not that its impossible, just not likely. These counters look great, but I dont see them being done.
heres a technique that can work, or works in theory, i have used it in sparring, dont really think its that practical for a fight, and you dont see thais using it, if you used this same counter with the oblique kick, you would definitely ruin your knee as oblique is a side kick coming in at a downward angle.
teep to thigh and oblique kick are very different, teep is to thigh with ball of foot in a more horizontal direction. knee stomp is sideways and angled downards. Im sure you probably know this already.
The kneebar is a submission, the goal of a submission is to get the guy to submit, if the kneebar is that dangerous, and guys really do not have any time to "submit" during said submission, than maybe it should be illegal. Fighters safety should always be in mind, theres plenty of other strikes that are illegal due to fighters safety, such as the soccer kick to the head being removed, while striking is still legal. Perhaps this submission should be removed, along with the oblique kick.
Well here at shincheckin school, we believe if someone is trying to ruin our knee, a soccer kick to the head is a fair trade off. What are we going to ban soccer kicks to the head now?
At what point do you draw the line? Who cares bro, its a fight! well then why ban anything at all bro, its a fight!
Its just lame dude, it can go on and on.