- Joined
- Sep 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,517
- Reaction score
- 515
But apparently you and Grover think that all that matters is physical abilities and that fighting skill doesn't matter..
At no point was I ever arguing that. I was arguing that someone's prime years are not when they are 35 (as that is what someone attempted to say).
The problem is you, and most MMA fans TBH, are equating success with prime. Which are not the same thing.
You still haven't answered the question? Do you think Werdum was a better fighter in his 20s when his striking sucked ass or when he was KOing Mark Hunt and beating up and submitting Cain?
because its irrelevant. Its a total strawman. See above RE: success vs prime.
Also the fact that you are using Werdum, a proven PED abuser, as your example is horribly flawed as we know that PED's can prolong athletes effectiveness much longer than they naturally would be able to sustain.
Last edited: