- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 11,980
- Reaction score
- 116
If you want an overview of that approach, I could give it.
I do. If its not too much trouble of course
If you want an overview of that approach, I could give it.
Taking damage isn't really an Art form. Toughness and grit. There's very few guys who will make it on that alone, and most of those ones don't make it all the way to the top, the ones that do don't always win, either. The ones that win tend to be more skilled than people like to remember. Julio Cesar Chavez was always known for being nearly impossible to hurt, but he didn't get hit clean quite as often as people recall:
He wasn't an uneducated brawler who went SIMPLY on grit and barely more. He was actually a pretty skilled forward-moving boxer who was hard to hit, then when you did hit him, it didn't work. Even Benny Briscoe, who was renowned for his toughness and chin, and moving forward into the foray for an entire fight, was not so easy to hit and used a lot of defensive motions AS he came at you. But even as he did, he got hit back quite a bit and at times, frighteningly so. Benny never could beat Valdez for this reason:
Now, if you want to see how these guys end up fighting once their punch resistance wanes even a little bit. Michael Katsidis' last fight is a good demonstration:
Now, rumor has it that Katsidis was ill-prepared for this contest. However, tough guys like this are known for pulling fights out even when they're ill-prepared, because you don't really prepare that kind of toughness. It's just there or it isn't. It's starting to look like that for Katsidis, it's not there anymore. The reason? It gets beaten out of them eventually.
notice the lesser skilled guys fall off the fastest and most obviously-margarito-williams-jones jr - baldomir-gatti-ward-olivera; whereas guys like augustus mayweather hopkins, the steps lost aren't as obvious nor is the level of performance.
Why did you include Jones in that category?
Why did you include Jones in that category?