Holm vs Tate rematch? No way!

squeezewax

Red Belt
@red
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
7,632
Reaction score
2,005
As soon as Rousey lost to Holm we were told there would be a rematch down the line, thats all we heard from then on.
So how about a Tate vs Holm rematch straight away then? Holm destroyed Rousey and IMO Rousey doesn't deserve a rematch.
I didn't see the Holm vs Tate fight but from what i read it wasn't as one sided as Holm's last fight, isn't a rematch in order then?

Personally i don't like rematches so soon after the first fight. I'm just pointing out the fact that with Rousey it was rematch, rematch, with Holm it'll be quiet.

Rousey will beat Tate and be the champ again[unfortunately.] People will say she's the best ever!
 
Good point that no one gives a fuck about?
 
Who cares indeed. Ronda will wait a very long time if she returns. Tate will be fighting before she returns, I'm betting. Probably Holm rematches. Holm will fight again soon, whether Tate, Ronda, or someone else...
 
Good chance Ronda is done. Call me crazy, but I give Tate the upper hand to decision rousey. RRR isn't the same fighter as she was when she fought Tate the first two times.

As far as Holm tate 2. I think Tate takes it as well. She'll get her to the ground sooner and sub her again. Holly looked pretty bad on the ground.
 
The only reason there was no rematch after holm/Rousey is because Rousey said she wouldnt, wanted time off to act.

Holm can have a rematch if she wants it....and she is showing she's not afraid to fight between the big money shows so it could very well happen.
 
I could easily see this one getting booked right away for UFC 200, then the winner waiting on the "supposed" return of Ronda in November.
 
Get owned, embarrassed, and destroyed (Rousey) = immediate rematch

Lose in the final round of a fight you were winning (Holm) = no rematch
 
Dana already said that Ronda isnt fighting until October. They would want something for 200. Makes sense that Holly and Meisha do it again.
 
Back
Top