- Joined
- Jul 16, 2007
- Messages
- 49,276
- Reaction score
- 2,462
Its a very real possibility that Trump will use this case against Hillary, along with Bill's numerous sexual assaults, to show she is not a champion of women at all. My question is...do you guys think it is fair game?
For those that are unfamiliar with the story Hillary legally defended a child rapist back in 1975 while knowing full well he was guilty. The 12 yr old victim who ended up in a coma for 5 days and never able to have children was accused, by Hillary, of being "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing". She also speculated that the victim may have been "exaggerating" due to her "disorganized family".
A while back some old tapes surfaced of a young, southern drawl sounding Hillary chuckling while making the following remarks about her client:
She also acknowledges that her client had the victims blood on his underwear. But because the crime lab mishandled the evidence she was able to dismiss the evidence and was able to "plea bargain it down" as a result.
So here we have Hillary Clinton fighting to dismiss evidence, calling a child rape victim a liar basically, and reducing the the guys sentence all the while knowing that this man brutally raped this 12 yr old girl. And she did all of this while being married to a serial sexual abuser.
If Donald chooses to he can crush Hillary with this narrative and show that she is no champion of women at all.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2...rape-victim-hillary-clinton-daniel-greenfield
For those that are unfamiliar with the story Hillary legally defended a child rapist back in 1975 while knowing full well he was guilty. The 12 yr old victim who ended up in a coma for 5 days and never able to have children was accused, by Hillary, of being "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing". She also speculated that the victim may have been "exaggerating" due to her "disorganized family".
A while back some old tapes surfaced of a young, southern drawl sounding Hillary chuckling while making the following remarks about her client:
“He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,”
She also acknowledges that her client had the victims blood on his underwear. But because the crime lab mishandled the evidence she was able to dismiss the evidence and was able to "plea bargain it down" as a result.
So here we have Hillary Clinton fighting to dismiss evidence, calling a child rape victim a liar basically, and reducing the the guys sentence all the while knowing that this man brutally raped this 12 yr old girl. And she did all of this while being married to a serial sexual abuser.
If Donald chooses to he can crush Hillary with this narrative and show that she is no champion of women at all.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2...rape-victim-hillary-clinton-daniel-greenfield