1 punch = KO is generally better than 50 punches = no KONobody at Sherdog can answer that.
Nobody anywhere can really give an answer to such a strong hypothetical. It will be fun to read the nonsense.....
So the accumulation of punches = shorter brain life?1 punch = KO is generally better than 50 punches = no KO
No deaths in boxing have ever been 1 punch deaths. Its always a brutal accumulation.
So which is worse in your opinion?Well if you aren't being Ko'd the guy isn't punching you hard enough.
Niether of them is good for your health. Pro long brain trauma leads to brain damage. Being Ko leads to brain damage. Your brain is being shut off for a reason.
Im not qualified to answer this but I will anyway. Yes.So the accumulation of punches = shorter brain life?
So which is worse in your opinion?
Hagler and Chuvalo both have better chins imo. To answer the TS I think it's better to have an ok chin and to be put out of only a little damage. Sustained beatings lead to CTE.GOAT chin Jake LaMotta died at 96.
Chins are a mysterious thing.
Is it better to have granite chin and absorb punishment or to have an ok chin and go out? I mean for the longevity of the fighter's health wise?
Is it better to have granite chin and absorb punishment or to have an ok chin and go out? I mean for the longevity of the fighter's health wise?